analyze-action-pr: record the qodana only-in-rebuilt precedent - #1126
Merged
Conversation
Adds a precedents row for #1123 and a gap-table row for the shape: a two-stage `tsc` -> `esbuild` build where OUT_DIR resolves to the sub-project, so the gitignored stage-one `lib/` output appears only in the rebuild. Notes that #960 hit the same false positive and was merged over it -- only the gradle-jar half of that failure was fixed (in #951) -- so a future run can cite the precedent instead of re-deriving it. Generated-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) via Claude Code
dave2wave
approved these changes
Jul 30, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Follow-up to the #1123 triage. Adds two rows to the
analyze-action-prskill:hit the same false positive and was merged over it.
tsc->esbuildbuild whereOUT_DIRresolves to the sub-project, so thegitignored stage-one
lib/appears only in the rebuild.So a future run can cite the precedent instead of re-deriving the analysis.