Skip to content

[FLINK-xxx][runtime/metrics] test with SAMPLE_INTERVAL = 1#28257

Draft
Efrat19 wants to merge 1 commit into
apache:masterfrom
Efrat19:state-tracking-not-working-with-sample-interval-of-1
Draft

[FLINK-xxx][runtime/metrics] test with SAMPLE_INTERVAL = 1#28257
Efrat19 wants to merge 1 commit into
apache:masterfrom
Efrat19:state-tracking-not-working-with-sample-interval-of-1

Conversation

@Efrat19
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Efrat19 Efrat19 commented May 26, 2026

What is the purpose of the change

(For example: This pull request makes task deployment go through the blob server, rather than through RPC. That way we avoid re-transferring them on each deployment (during recovery).)

Brief change log

(for example:)

  • The TaskInfo is stored in the blob store on job creation time as a persistent artifact
  • Deployments RPC transmits only the blob storage reference
  • TaskManagers retrieve the TaskInfo from the blob cache

Verifying this change

Please make sure both new and modified tests in this PR follow the conventions for tests defined in our code quality guide.

(Please pick either of the following options)

This change is a trivial rework / code cleanup without any test coverage.

(or)

This change is already covered by existing tests, such as (please describe tests).

(or)

This change added tests and can be verified as follows:

(example:)

  • Added integration tests for end-to-end deployment with large payloads (100MB)
  • Extended integration test for recovery after master (JobManager) failure
  • Added test that validates that TaskInfo is transferred only once across recoveries
  • Manually verified the change by running a 4 node cluster with 2 JobManagers and 4 TaskManagers, a stateful streaming program, and killing one JobManager and two TaskManagers during the execution, verifying that recovery happens correctly.

Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:

  • Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): (yes / no)
  • The public API, i.e., is any changed class annotated with @Public(Evolving): (yes / no)
  • The serializers: (yes / no / don't know)
  • The runtime per-record code paths (performance sensitive): (yes / no / don't know)
  • Anything that affects deployment or recovery: JobManager (and its components), Checkpointing, Kubernetes/Yarn, ZooKeeper: (yes / no / don't know)
  • The S3 file system connector: (yes / no / don't know)

Documentation

  • Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (yes / no)
  • If yes, how is the feature documented? (not applicable / docs / JavaDocs / not documented)

Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?
  • Yes (please specify the tool below)

@flinkbot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

flinkbot commented May 26, 2026

CI report:

Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands:
  • @flinkbot run azure re-run the last Azure build

@Efrat19
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Efrat19 commented May 26, 2026

@flinkbot run azure

[FLINK-xxx][runtime/metrics] test with SAMPLE_INTERVAL = 1

[FLINK-xxx][runtime/metrics] test with SAMPLE_INTERVAL = 1
@Efrat19 Efrat19 force-pushed the state-tracking-not-working-with-sample-interval-of-1 branch from acc77a6 to c0dbd53 Compare May 27, 2026 08:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants