[FLINK-37448] Report actual TaskManager count in status.taskManager.replicas

[vsantwana]

What is the purpose of the change

status.taskManager.replicas previously held a value computed from the spec at reconcile time (ceil(parallelism / slots)). This is inaccurate for deployments where the number of TaskManagers fluctuates dynamically rather than being fixed by configuration - most notably standalone clusters running in reactive mode.

This change makes the field report the actual number of TaskManagers registered with the running Flink cluster, sourced from the Flink REST API (/taskmanagers), for both application and session deployments.

Brief change log

• Added FlinkService#getTaskManagerReplicas(Configuration), implemented in AbstractFlinkService via the existing /taskmanagers REST call; getClusterInfo now routes through it (single source of truth).
• AbstractFlinkDeploymentObserver#observeClusterInfo now sets status.taskManager (label selector + actual replica count) whenever the JobManager is ready, covering both application and session clusters.
• ReconciliationUtils#getTaskManagerInfo no longer derives the count from the spec; at reconcile time it only sets the label selector (replicas stay 0 until the cluster is observed) and still clears the info when not running.
• Extracted the duplicated TaskManager label selector into FlinkUtils#getTaskManagerLabelSelector`.
• Updated the TaskManagerInfo.replicas JavaDoc and the generated CRD eference docs to reflect the new semantics.

Note: this changes the semantics of status.taskManager.replicas from a spec-derived value to the observed cluster state.

Verifying this change

This change added tests and can be verified as follows:

• ApplicationObserverTest#observeReportsActualTaskManagerReplicas verifies the
  status reflects the cluster's actual TaskManager count (independent of the
  spec-derived value) and tracks changes across observations.
• TestingFlinkService gained an overridable taskManagerReplicas stub
  (defaults to a converged cluster, i.e. the spec-derived count).
• Existing controller/observer/service/metrics tests updated/confirmed.

Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:

• Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): no
• The public API, i.e., is any changes to the CustomResourceDescriptors: no (the field already exists; only its reported value changes)
• Core observer or reconciler logic that is regularly executed: yes

Documentation

• Does this pull request introduce a new feature? no (behavior change to an existing status field)
• If yes, how is the feature documented? JavaDocs / docs (CRD reference updated)

[Dennis-Mircea]

This PR needs more test coverage as well. The new tests covers only the application observer. The change deliberately covers session clusters too, but there is no session-path test. Consider tightening the test coverage as well.