-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 303
feat: broadcast small build sides via non-zero CollectLeft thresholds #1900
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
andygrove
merged 9 commits into
apache:main
from
andygrove:test/1770-unzero-broadcast-threshold
Jul 1, 2026
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
fc6ec0d
feat(core): broadcast small build sides via non-zero CollectLeft thre…
andygrove 79651d7
fix(scheduler): restrict CollectLeft broadcast to safe join types
andygrove 3ec52c3
fix(scheduler): guard static planner broadcast and add join-type test…
andygrove 58f3867
test(core): update upgrade defaults test for non-zero CollectLeft thr…
andygrove fadd247
Merge branch 'main' into test/1770-unzero-broadcast-threshold
andygrove fbd116c
fix(scheduler): use dyn ExecutionPlan::downcast_ref in broadcast tests
andygrove b40a670
fix: demote DataFusion-promoted unsafe CollectLeft joins to partitioned
andygrove 382b8e1
fix: disable DataFusion dynamic filter pushdown in session defaults
andygrove 4df718b
Merge branch 'main' into test/1770-unzero-broadcast-threshold
andygrove File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
#1055 is fixed now, so we can revert the workaround
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't really understand yet why #1647 fixed this for left/outer joins?
E.g. see
apache/datafusion#12454 for discussion ot it.
It doesn't really change reporting on unmatched rows (for which it needs to produce null rows)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It probably needs some test cases for those ("duplicated unmatched keys across executors") to make sure they don't regress and then see if we finally solve it / bring it back? :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I hit a regression when running benchmarks locally with AQE enabled, so moving this to draft. I also created #1913 so that we have CI tests for AQE to avoid regressions. Looking into feedback now.