Skip to content

chore[benches]: add REE interleave benchmarks - #9849

Merged
Jefffrey merged 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
polarsignals:asubiotto/reeinterleave
May 5, 2026
Merged

chore[benches]: add REE interleave benchmarks#9849
Jefffrey merged 1 commit into
apache:mainfrom
polarsignals:asubiotto/reeinterleave

Conversation

@asubiotto

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

In preparation for a specialized interleave kernel.

Which issue does this PR close?

  • No issue needed: benchmark addition

Rationale for this change

I want to open a subsequent PR adding the specialized REE interleave kernel.

What changes are included in this PR?

Benchmarks

Are these changes tested?

Not necessary

Are there any user-facing changes?

No

In preparation for a specialized interleave kernel.

Signed-off-by: Alfonso Subiotto Marques <alfonso.subiotto@polarsignals.com>
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the arrow Changes to the arrow crate label Apr 29, 2026
@Jefffrey
Jefffrey merged commit f4a0f22 into apache:main May 5, 2026
23 checks passed
@Jefffrey

Jefffrey commented May 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thanks @asubiotto

alamb pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 7, 2026
Benchmarks for this PR are in #9849. They have been separated out so we
can compare this PR to main once the benchmarks have merged.

The specialized interleave works by preserving run ends as much as
possible by coalescing groups of adjacent logical indices pointing to
the same source and calling interleave on the run end values.

Future work could additionally coalesce values across sources, but this
requires a value equality check.

# Which issue does this PR close?

<!--
We generally require a GitHub issue to be filed for all bug fixes and
enhancements and this helps us generate change logs for our releases.
You can link an issue to this PR using the GitHub syntax.
-->

- None

# Rationale for this change

<!--
Why are you proposing this change? If this is already explained clearly
in the issue then this section is not needed.
Explaining clearly why changes are proposed helps reviewers understand
your changes and offer better suggestions for fixes.
-->
interleave_fallback on REE arrays is slow

# What changes are included in this PR?

<!--
There is no need to duplicate the description in the issue here but it
is sometimes worth providing a summary of the individual changes in this
PR.
-->
A specialized REE interleave implementation

# Are these changes tested?

<!--
We typically require tests for all PRs in order to:
1. Prevent the code from being accidentally broken by subsequent changes
2. Serve as another way to document the expected behavior of the code

If tests are not included in your PR, please explain why (for example,
are they covered by existing tests)?

If this PR claims a performance improvement, please include evidence
such as benchmark results.
-->
Yes, by existing tests.

# Are there any user-facing changes?

<!--
If there are user-facing changes then we may require documentation to be
updated before approving the PR.

If there are any breaking changes to public APIs, please call them out.
-->

Signed-off-by: Alfonso Subiotto Marques <alfonso.subiotto@polarsignals.com>
@asubiotto
asubiotto deleted the asubiotto/reeinterleave branch May 8, 2026 10:30
Rich-T-kid pushed a commit to Rich-T-kid/arrow-rs that referenced this pull request Jun 2, 2026
In preparation for a specialized interleave kernel.

# Which issue does this PR close?

<!--
We generally require a GitHub issue to be filed for all bug fixes and
enhancements and this helps us generate change logs for our releases.
You can link an issue to this PR using the GitHub syntax.
-->

- No issue needed: benchmark addition

# Rationale for this change

<!--
Why are you proposing this change? If this is already explained clearly
in the issue then this section is not needed.
Explaining clearly why changes are proposed helps reviewers understand
your changes and offer better suggestions for fixes.
-->
I want to open a subsequent PR adding the specialized REE interleave
kernel.

# What changes are included in this PR?

<!--
There is no need to duplicate the description in the issue here but it
is sometimes worth providing a summary of the individual changes in this
PR.
-->
Benchmarks

# Are these changes tested?

<!--
We typically require tests for all PRs in order to:
1. Prevent the code from being accidentally broken by subsequent changes
2. Serve as another way to document the expected behavior of the code

If tests are not included in your PR, please explain why (for example,
are they covered by existing tests)?
-->
Not necessary

# Are there any user-facing changes?

<!--
If there are user-facing changes then we may require documentation to be
updated before approving the PR.

If there are any breaking changes to public APIs, please call them out.
-->
No

Signed-off-by: Alfonso Subiotto Marques <alfonso.subiotto@polarsignals.com>
Rich-T-kid pushed a commit to Rich-T-kid/arrow-rs that referenced this pull request Jun 2, 2026
Benchmarks for this PR are in apache#9849. They have been separated out so we
can compare this PR to main once the benchmarks have merged.

The specialized interleave works by preserving run ends as much as
possible by coalescing groups of adjacent logical indices pointing to
the same source and calling interleave on the run end values.

Future work could additionally coalesce values across sources, but this
requires a value equality check.

# Which issue does this PR close?

<!--
We generally require a GitHub issue to be filed for all bug fixes and
enhancements and this helps us generate change logs for our releases.
You can link an issue to this PR using the GitHub syntax.
-->

- None

# Rationale for this change

<!--
Why are you proposing this change? If this is already explained clearly
in the issue then this section is not needed.
Explaining clearly why changes are proposed helps reviewers understand
your changes and offer better suggestions for fixes.
-->
interleave_fallback on REE arrays is slow

# What changes are included in this PR?

<!--
There is no need to duplicate the description in the issue here but it
is sometimes worth providing a summary of the individual changes in this
PR.
-->
A specialized REE interleave implementation

# Are these changes tested?

<!--
We typically require tests for all PRs in order to:
1. Prevent the code from being accidentally broken by subsequent changes
2. Serve as another way to document the expected behavior of the code

If tests are not included in your PR, please explain why (for example,
are they covered by existing tests)?

If this PR claims a performance improvement, please include evidence
such as benchmark results.
-->
Yes, by existing tests.

# Are there any user-facing changes?

<!--
If there are user-facing changes then we may require documentation to be
updated before approving the PR.

If there are any breaking changes to public APIs, please call them out.
-->

Signed-off-by: Alfonso Subiotto Marques <alfonso.subiotto@polarsignals.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

arrow Changes to the arrow crate

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants