[v3-3-test] Call listeners for running task instance when a Dag Run state is manually set#70286
Merged
Merged
Conversation
…ally set (apache#69874) * Call listeners for running task instance when a Dag Run state is manually set * Address PR review # Conflicts: # airflow-core/tests/unit/api_fastapi/core_api/routes/public/test_dag_run.py * Remove two comment lines. * Add newsfragment * fix after rebase (cherry picked from commit b6d81b9)
pierrejeambrun
requested review from
bugraoz93,
choo121600,
ephraimbuddy,
henry3260,
jason810496,
rawwar and
shubhamraj-git
as code owners
July 23, 2026 08:21
Contributor
|
Hi maintainer, this PR was merged without a milestone set.
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Backport of #69874 to
v3-3-test.Cherry-picked from b6d81b9.
Clean cherry-pick, no conflicts. The prerequisite #69873 (which adds the
dag/note/msgpopulation and theClassBasedListenerfields this change builds on) is already onv3-3-testvia #70245, so this applied cleanly on top.Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?
Generated-by: Claude Code (Opus 4.8) following the guidelines