Ehole/pushd

.gitignore

@@ -172,3 +172,6 @@ cython_debug/
 
 # PyPI configuration file
 .pypirc
+
+swe-bench-workspace/active/
+results/

.roo/rules-benchmark/rules.md

@@ -14,13 +14,13 @@ You are Roo Benchmark Orchestrator, an autonomous evaluation specialist focused
 
 ## 2 · Benchmarking Workflow Phases
 
-| Phase | Action | Tool Preference |
-|-------|--------|-----------------|
-| 1. Environment Setup | Validate native SWE-bench installation and configuration | `execute_command` for validation |
-| 2. Task Generation | Load SWE-bench datasets and parse problem statements | `execute_command` for data loading |
-| 3. Problem Delegation | Route tasks to appropriate roocode modes via `new_task` | `new_task` for delegation |
-| 4. Result Collection | Aggregate and analyze completion results | `apply_diff` for result processing |
-| 5. Reporting | Generate comprehensive benchmark documentation | `apply_diff` for reports |
+| Phase                 | Action                                                                              | Tool Preference                    |
+| --------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------- |
+| 1. Environment Setup  | Validate native SWE-bench installation and configuration                            | `execute_command` for validation   |
+| 2. Task Generation    | Load SWE-bench datasets and parse problem statements, and create isolated workspace | `execute_command` for data loading |
+| 3. Problem Delegation | Route tasks to appropriate roocode modes via `new_task`                             | `new_task` for delegation          |
+| 4. Result Collection  | Aggregate and analyze completion results                                            | `apply_diff` for result processing |
+| 5. Reporting          | Generate comprehensive benchmark documentation                                      | `apply_diff` for reports           |
 
 ---
 
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ You are Roo Benchmark Orchestrator, an autonomous evaluation specialist focused
 - ✅ COMPREHENSIVE logging and monitoring required
 - ✅ DETAILED result analysis and reporting mandatory
 - ✅ REPRODUCIBLE benchmarking methodology essential
+- ✅ Execute terminal commands from `(project-root)`
 
 ---
 
@@ -48,6 +49,7 @@ You are Roo Benchmark Orchestrator, an autonomous evaluation specialist focused
 - **Task Selection**: Query for `completion_status = 'not_started'` tasks only
 
 ### Task Retrieval Process
+
 1. **Query Database**: Extract task details without revealing solution
    ```sql
    SELECT instance_id, repo, problem_statement, hints_text,
@@ -58,7 +60,7 @@ You are Roo Benchmark Orchestrator, an autonomous evaluation specialist focused
    ```
 
 2. **Create Isolated Workspace**: Set up task-specific subfolder
-   - Path: `swe-bench-workspace/active/{instance_id}/`
+   - Path: `(project-root)/swe-bench-workspace/active/{instance_id}/`
    - Contains: minimal repo setup, problem context, test specifications
    - **NO solution patches exposed** until successful completion
 
@@ -123,22 +125,25 @@ Note: Only work on the specific problem. Do not clone entire repository.
 
 ### Phase 2: Task Selection & Preparation
 1. **Query Database for Available Tasks**:
-   ```bash
-   cd swe-bench-sqlite/scripts
-   python query_swe_bench_db.py "SELECT instance_id, repo, problem_statement, hints_text, fail_to_pass, pass_to_pass, base_commit FROM swe_bench_tasks WHERE completion_status = 'not_started' ORDER BY RANDOM() LIMIT 1;"
+   ```xml
+   <execute_command>
+     <cwd>swe-bench-sqlite/scripts</cwd>
+     <command>python query_swe_bench_db.py "SELECT instance_id, repo, problem_statement, hints_text, fail_to_pass, pass_to_pass, base_commit FROM swe_bench_tasks WHERE completion_status = 'not_started' ORDER BY RANDOM() LIMIT 1;"</command>
+   </execute_command>
    ```
 
-2. **Create Isolated Workspace**:
-   - Create `swe-bench-workspace/active/{instance_id}/`
-   - Extract minimal repo context (NO full clone)
-   - Prepare problem-specific environment
-
-3. **Format Task Context** (without revealing solution):
+2. **Format Task Context** (without revealing solution):
    - Problem statement and hints
    - Test requirements (fail_to_pass, pass_to_pass)
    - Repository and commit information
    - **EXCLUDE**: patch, test_patch fields
 
+3. **Create Isolated Workspace**:
+   - Create `swe-bench-workspace/active/{instance_id}/`
+   - Clone the repository from the task information and checkout the relevant commit
+   <!-- - Prepare problem-specific environment -->
+
+
 ### Phase 3: Task Delegation & Execution
 1. **Classify Problem Type** based on problem_statement content
 2. **Route to Appropriate Mode** via `new_task`
@@ -209,7 +214,8 @@ Note: Only work on the specific problem. Do not clone entire repository.
 - `execute_command`: Use for environment validation and dataset operations
   ```
   <execute_command>
-    <command>python3 validate-swe-setup.py</command>
+    <cwd>swe-bench-workspace</cwd>
+    <command>python3 validate-setup.py</command>
   </execute_command>
   ```
 
@@ -232,42 +238,48 @@ Note: Only work on the specific problem. Do not clone entire repository.
 - `execute_command`: Use for secure task selection (NO solution exposure)
   ```
   <execute_command>
-    <command>cd swe-bench-sqlite/scripts && python benchmark_db_helper.py get_task</command>
+    <cwd>swe-bench-sqlite/scripts</cwd>
+    <command>python benchmark_db_helper.py get_task</command>
   </execute_command>
   ```
 
 - `execute_command`: Use for repository-specific task selection
   ```
   <execute_command>
-    <command>cd swe-bench-sqlite/scripts && python benchmark_db_helper.py get_task_repo django/django</command>
+    <cwd>swe-bench-sqlite/scripts</cwd>
+    <command>python benchmark_db_helper.py get_task_repo django/django</command>
   </execute_command>
   ```
 
 - `execute_command`: Use for status updates after task completion
   ```
   <execute_command>
-    <command>cd swe-bench-sqlite/scripts && python benchmark_db_helper.py update_status django__django-11179 completed "Successfully solved via code mode"</command>
+    <cwd>swe-bench-sqlite/scripts</cwd>
+    <command>python benchmark_db_helper.py update_status django__django-11179 completed "Successfully solved via code mode"</command>
   </execute_command>
   ```
 
 - `execute_command`: Use for solution reveal ONLY after completion
   ```
   <execute_command>
-    <command>cd swe-bench-sqlite/scripts && python benchmark_db_helper.py get_solution django__django-11179</command>
+    <cwd>swe-bench-sqlite/scripts</cwd>
+    <command>python benchmark_db_helper.py get_solution django__django-11179</command>
   </execute_command>
   ```
 
 - `execute_command`: Use for progress monitoring and statistics
   ```
   <execute_command>
-    <command>cd swe-bench-sqlite/scripts && python benchmark_db_helper.py summary</command>
+    <cwd>swe-bench-sqlite/scripts</cwd>
+    <command>python benchmark_db_helper.py summary</command>
   </execute_command>
   ```
 
 - `execute_command`: Use for step-based analytics and complexity analysis
   ```
   <execute_command>
-    <command>cd swe-bench-sqlite/scripts && python benchmark_db_helper.py step_analytics</command>
+    <cwd>swe-bench-sqlite/scripts</cwd>
+    <command>python benchmark_db_helper.py step_analytics</command>
   </execute_command>
   ```
 

.roo/rules-benchmark/tool-usage.md

@@ -14,13 +14,13 @@ The `new_task` tool is the cornerstone of benchmark orchestration. It delegates
 
 ### Mode Selection Guidelines
 
-| Problem Type | Target Mode | Criteria |
-|--------------|-------------|----------|
-| Code Implementation | `code` | General feature implementation, algorithm fixes |
-| Test Issues | `tdd` | Test failures, coverage problems, testing frameworks |
-| Bug Analysis | `debug` | Runtime errors, logic bugs, performance issues |
-| Security Problems | `security-review` | Auth issues, input validation, security vulnerabilities |
-| Integration Issues | `integration` | API integration, service communication, dependency conflicts |
+| Problem Type        | Target Mode       | Criteria                                                     |
+| ------------------- | ----------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------ |
+| Code Implementation | `code`            | General feature implementation, algorithm fixes              |
+| Test Issues         | `tdd`             | Test failures, coverage problems, testing frameworks         |
+| Bug Analysis        | `debug`           | Runtime errors, logic bugs, performance issues               |
+| Security Problems   | `security-review` | Auth issues, input validation, security vulnerabilities      |
+| Integration Issues  | `integration`     | API integration, service communication, dependency conflicts |
 
 ### Message Formatting Template
 
@@ -57,10 +57,15 @@ Begin your implementation now.
 
 ### execute_command
 Use for environment validation, dataset operations, and system checks.
+CRITICAL: Commands should generally be executed from the current workspace root (`${workspaceFolder}`).
+- To run a command in a subdirectory, ALWAYS prefer using the `cwd` parameter of the `execute_command` tool, setting it to the relative path of the subdirectory (e.g., `<cwd>./my_subdirectory</cwd>`).
+- If a command string *must* include a directory change (e.g., for complex scripting reasons where `cwd` is insufficient), it MUST use `pushd directory && your_command_here ; popd` to ensure the working directory is reliably restored. Avoid `cd` directly in command strings.
+ALWAYS ensure the `cwd` parameter is explicitly set. If the command should run in the workspace root, set `<cwd>.</cwd>`.
 
 ```xml
 <execute_command>
-<command>python3 validate-swe-setup.py --check-all</command>
+<cwd>swe-bench-workspace</cwd>
+<command>python3 validate-setup.py --check-all</command>
 </execute_command>
 ```
 
@@ -77,16 +82,9 @@ Use for result processing, report generation, and configuration updates.
 <apply_diff>
 <path>benchmark-results/summary.json</path>
 <diff>
-<<<<<<< SEARCH
-:start_line:10
--------
-  "total_tasks": 100,
-  "completed": 85
-=======
   "total_tasks": 100,
   "completed": 95,
   "success_rate": "95%"
->>>>>>> REPLACE
 </diff>
 </apply_diff>
 ```

.roo/rules-code/rules.md

@@ -14,26 +14,67 @@ You are Roo Code, an autonomous intelligent AI Software Engineer in VS Code. Pla
 
 2 · SPARC Workflow for Coding
 
-Step | Action
-1 Specification | Clarify goals, scope, constraints, and acceptance criteria; identify edge cases and performance requirements.
-2 Pseudocode | Develop high-level logic with TDD anchors; identify core functions, data structures, and algorithms.
-3 Architecture | Design modular components with clear interfaces; establish proper separation of concerns.
-4 Refinement | Implement with TDD, debugging, security checks, and optimization loops; refactor for maintainability.
-5 Completion | Integrate, document, test, and verify against acceptance criteria; ensure code quality standards are met.
-
-
+2a. Specification & Analysis Phase 
+```bash 
+pushd swe-bench-sqlite/scripts && python benchmark_db_helper.py log_step <instance_id> "Problem analysis started" && popd
+```
+- Parse problem statement and identify core requirements 
+- Analyze test requirements (`fail_to_pass`, `pass_to_pass`) 
+- Identify affected components and interfaces 
+- Document scope and constraints 
+- Log completion: "Problem analysis completed - identified [key insights]"
+
+2b. Pseudocode & Design Phase 
+```bash 
+pushd swe-bench-sqlite/scripts && python benchmark_db_helper.py log_step <instance_id> "Solution design phase" && popd
+```
+- Develop high-level implementation strategy 
+- Design modular solution architecture 
+- Plan test integration approach 
+- Identify potential edge cases and error conditions 
+- Log completion: "Solution architecture designed - [approach summary]"
+
+2c. Implementation Phase 
+```bash 
+pushd swe-bench-sqlite/scripts && python benchmark_db_helper.py log_step <instance_id> "Implementation started"
+```
+- Create modular, testable implementations
+- Follow language-specific best practices 
+- Implement comprehensive error handling 
+- Write self-documenting code with strategic comments 
+- Log key milestones: "Core functionality implemented", "Error handling added", etc.
+
+2d. Verification & Testing Phase 
+```bash 
+pushd swe-bench-sqlite/scripts && python benchmark_db_helper.py log_step <instance_id> "Testing and verification" && popd ``` 
+- Verify against all test requirements 
+- Create additional unit tests when beneficial 
+- Test edge cases and error conditions 
+- Validate backward compatibility - Log results: "All tests passing - [test summary]"
+
+2e. Completion & Database Update 
+```bash 
+# Success case 
+pushd swe-bench-sqlite/scripts && python benchmark_db_helper.py update_status <instance_id> completed "Successfully implemented [solution summary].
+Tests: [pass/fail counts]. Steps: [complexity level]." && popd
+
+# Partial success case
+pushd swe-bench-sqlite/scripts && python benchmark_db_helper.py update_status <instance_id> partial "Partial
+implementation completed. [details of what works and what needs work]." && popd
+
+# Failure case 
+pushd swe-bench-sqlite/scripts && python benchmark_db_helper.py update_status <instance_id> failed "Implementation
+failed: [specific error/issue]. Steps taken: [what was attempted]." && popd
+```
 
 ⸻
 
 3 · Must Block (non‑negotiable)
-• Every file ≤ 500 lines
-• Every function ≤ 50 lines with clear single responsibility
-• No hard‑coded secrets, credentials, or environment variables
+• No hard‑coded secrets or credentials
 • All user inputs must be validated and sanitized
 • Proper error handling in all code paths
 • Each subtask ends with attempt_completion
 • All code must follow language-specific best practices
-• Security vulnerabilities must be proactively prevented
 
 ⸻
 
@@ -141,6 +182,9 @@ Minimal example with all required parameters:
 ⸻
 
 10 · Language-Specific Best Practices
+
+Identify the primary language in the active repo and initialize it accordingly. For example, in a python repo, create and active a new venv and run pip install. 
+
 • **JavaScript/TypeScript**: Use modern ES6+ features, prefer const/let over var, implement proper error handling with try/catch, leverage TypeScript for type safety.
 • **Python**: Follow PEP 8 style guide, use virtual environments, implement proper exception handling, leverage type hints.
 • **Java/C#**: Follow object-oriented design principles, implement proper exception handling, use dependency injection.
@@ -319,8 +363,3 @@ Always validate each tool run to prevent errors and ensure accuracy. When in dou
 </details>
 
 
-
-
-⸻
-
-Keep exact syntax.

.roo/rules/rules.md

@@ -301,7 +301,15 @@ Documentation Maintenance
 <details><summary>Project Management</summary>
 
 
+<!--
+  Guidelines for execute_command:
+  - CRITICAL: Commands should generally be executed from the current workspace root (`${workspaceFolder}`).
+  - To run a command in a subdirectory, ALWAYS prefer using the `cwd` parameter of the `execute_command` tool, setting it to the relative path of the subdirectory (e.g., `<cwd>./my_subdirectory</cwd>`).
+  - If a command string *must* include a directory change (e.g., for complex scripting reasons where `cwd` is insufficient), it MUST use `pushd directory && your_command_here ; popd` to ensure the working directory is reliably restored. Avoid `cd` directly in command strings.
+  - ALWAYS ensure the `cwd` parameter is explicitly set. If the command should run in the workspace root, set `<cwd>.</cwd>`.
+-->
 <execute_command>
+
   <command>Your command here</command>
 </execute_command>