Detail L1#35
Conversation
started to split out sub-diagrams
no longer specify width, but fix it in the CSS so all diagrams use the same scale.
I think this is correct, since an observation is not *composed* of them, it is a concept that collects them. You can have an observation without anything.
|
Do we want to stick with calling the exposure time intervals "OnTime", or be more general, like TimeInterval or ExposureTime? Also where do the deadtime, etc go? Are they also in that object or separate? |
since plantuml 2025.02 now seems to put the connectors too close to the package boundaries for some reason
|
|
||
| OnTime | ||
| ------ | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
About the OnTime (the previous GTIs), should we add as metadata the dead_time fraction? Or should we put this information (because I think that this is more a data than a metadata) as element of the interval (ie tstart, tstop, deadtime_fraction (optional))?
| } | ||
|
|
||
| Observation "1" -- "0..1" Pointing | ||
| ObsCore .r. Observation : "<<find>> >" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
its position in the diagram is a bit weird... But it might be difficult to adjust.
| package VODF { | ||
| class Facility | ||
| class Instrument | ||
| Facility -- Instrument : <<has>> > |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
its position in the diagram is a bit weird... But it might be difficult to adjust.
|
|
||
| package VODF.L1 { | ||
|
|
||
| abstract class OnTime |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
See above my comment on the deadtime_fraction
bkhelifi
left a comment
bkhelifi
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Many thanks for the improvements. I put here some comments
2 participants
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.