Skip to content

Add correct output of type function#88

Merged
andrewgait merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
78-output-of-type-function
Apr 21, 2026
Merged

Add correct output of type function#88
andrewgait merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
78-output-of-type-function

Conversation

@andrewgait

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Resolves #78

@andrewgait andrewgait linked an issue Apr 21, 2026 that may be closed by this pull request
@andrewgait andrewgait requested a review from Scottan April 21, 2026 15:33
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Apr 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Thank you!

Thank you for your pull request 😃

🤖 This automated message can help you check the rendered files in your submission for clarity. If you have any questions, please feel free to open an issue in {sandpaper}.

If you have files that automatically render output (e.g. R Markdown), then you should check for the following:

  • 🎯 correct output
  • 🖼️ correct figures
  • ❓ new warnings
  • ‼️ new errors

Rendered Changes

🔍 Inspect the changes: https://github.com/UoMResearchIT/programming_with_python/compare/md-outputs..md-outputs-PR-88

The following changes were observed in the rendered markdown documents:

 03-numpy_essential.md | 2 +-
 md5sum.txt            | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
What does this mean?

If you have source files that require output and figures to be generated (e.g. R Markdown), then it is important to make sure the generated figures and output are reproducible.

This output provides a way for you to inspect the output in a diff-friendly manner so that it's easy to see the changes that occur due to new software versions or randomisation.

⏱️ Updated at 2026-04-21 15:34:58 +0000

@Scottan Scottan left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM - approved

@andrewgait andrewgait merged commit dfa8597 into main Apr 21, 2026
5 checks passed
@andrewgait andrewgait deleted the 78-output-of-type-function branch April 21, 2026 15:48
@andrewgait andrewgait restored the 78-output-of-type-function branch April 21, 2026 15:48
@andrewgait andrewgait deleted the 78-output-of-type-function branch April 21, 2026 15:48
github-actions Bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 21, 2026
Auto-generated via `{sandpaper}`
Source  : dfa8597
Branch  : main
Author  : Andrew Gait <andrew.gait@manchester.ac.uk>
Time    : 2026-04-21 15:48:17 +0000
Message : Merge pull request #88 from UoMResearchIT/78-output-of-type-function

Add correct output of type function
github-actions Bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 21, 2026
Auto-generated via `{sandpaper}`
Source  : 8d2a3ba
Branch  : md-outputs
Author  : GitHub Actions <actions@github.com>
Time    : 2026-04-21 15:49:29 +0000
Message : markdown source builds

Auto-generated via `{sandpaper}`
Source  : dfa8597
Branch  : main
Author  : Andrew Gait <andrew.gait@manchester.ac.uk>
Time    : 2026-04-21 15:48:17 +0000
Message : Merge pull request #88 from UoMResearchIT/78-output-of-type-function

Add correct output of type function
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Output of type() function

2 participants