Skip to content

updating wrench to 1.5.3#677

Open
lopezt-unity wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
bugfix/wrench-update-1.5.3
Open

updating wrench to 1.5.3#677
lopezt-unity wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
bugfix/wrench-update-1.5.3

Conversation

@lopezt-unity
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Purpose of this PR

Updating wrench to 1.5.3

Links

Jira:

Comments to Reviewers

[List known issues, planned work, provide any extra context for your code.]

@lopezt-unity lopezt-unity requested a review from xianenli30 June 2, 2026 21:18
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@u-pr u-pr Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Perfect

These changes are clean and well-implemented, with no issues identified.

🤖 Helpful? 👍/👎

@codecov-github-com
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov-github-com Bot commented Jun 2, 2026

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #677   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   38.01%   38.02%           
=======================================
  Files         278      278           
  Lines       38851    38851           
=======================================
+ Hits        14771    14772    +1     
+ Misses      24080    24079    -1     
Flag Coverage Δ
probuilder_MacOS_6000.0 35.64% <ø> (ø)
probuilder_MacOS_6000.3 35.64% <ø> (ø)
probuilder_MacOS_6000.4 35.64% <ø> (ø)
probuilder_MacOS_6000.5 35.64% <ø> (ø)
probuilder_MacOS_6000.6 35.64% <ø> (ø)
probuilder_Ubuntu_6000.6 ?
probuilder_Windows_6000.0 35.56% <ø> (ø)
probuilder_Windows_6000.3 35.56% <ø> (ø)
probuilder_Windows_6000.4 35.56% <ø> (ø)
probuilder_Windows_6000.5 35.56% <ø> (ø)
probuilder_Windows_6000.6 35.56% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 1 file with indirect coverage changes

ℹ️ Need help interpreting these results?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant