docs: update ARCHITECTURE.md

[github-actions]

Auto-generated Architecture Update

The GitNexus knowledge graph detected structural changes in main and regenerated ARCHITECTURE.md.

This PR was created automatically by the update-architecture workflow.

[sourcery-ai]

Reviewer's guide (collapsed on small PRs)

Reviewer's Guide

Updates auto-generated GitNexus documentation to reflect the latest analysis snapshot, including refreshed index metrics in AGENTS.md and the architecture timestamp in ARCHITECTURE.md.

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Refresh GitNexus index statistics in agent documentation.	Update the reported symbol count to reflect the latest GitNexus analysis output. Update the reported relationship count to match the current knowledge graph. Keep execution flow count unchanged while ensuring the descriptive text remains identical aside from metrics.	AGENTS.md
Update architecture doc metadata to the latest generation timestamp.	Adjust the autogenerated architecture header to show the new last-updated UTC timestamp. Preserve the rest of the architecture content unchanged.	ARCHITECTURE.md

---

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

• Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
• Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
  issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
  review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
• Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
  request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
  @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
• Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
  the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
  want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
  (re-)generate the summary at any time.
• Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
  request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
• Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
  pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
  addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
• Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
  request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
  want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
  @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

• Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
  summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
• Change the review language.
• Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
• Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

• Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
• Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
• Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

[sourcery-ai]

Hey - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}

[Tony363]

LGTM

[github-actions]

Claude Code Review (via AWS Bedrock)

Overview

This PR updates the auto-generated ARCHITECTURE.md file, significantly simplifying it from 370 lines to 46 lines. The GitNexus statistics in AGENTS.md are also updated (9012 symbols, 21194 relationships). This represents a 93% reduction in architecture documentation detail.

Critical Issues

Major Documentation Loss: The PR removes extensive architecture documentation including:

• Complete Mermaid architecture diagram showing all system layers and interactions
• Detailed functional area descriptions (Core Engine, Agent System, Setup/Installer, MCP Integration, Rust Workspace)
• Module-by-module breakdowns with purpose tables
• 8 key execution flows with step-by-step traces
• Testing architecture overview covering 12 test directories
• CI/CD workflow documentation (23 workflows)
• Skills, Commands, and Obsidian integration details

Recommendation: Before merging, verify this simplification is intentional. If GitNexus analysis has changed methodology, consider:

1. Keeping the previous comprehensive documentation separately
2. Augmenting the new format with essential architectural context
3. Adding a note explaining the documentation approach change

High Priority

1. Sparse Content: The new version provides only 18 items across 4 sections (Entry Points, Core Modules, Data Flow, Agent Orchestration), which may be insufficient for onboarding or architectural decisions
2. Missing Context: No explanation of why the documentation was drastically simplified or what the new format represents
3. Metric Removal: Removed total symbols, relationships, and execution flows counts from the overview table without explanation

Medium Priority

1. Timestamp Format Change: Changed from "2026-04-01 UTC" to "2026-04-02 07:28 UTC" (added time precision) - ensure consistency is desired
2. Auto-generation Note: Both versions claim to be "Auto-generated by GitNexus" but the outputs are dramatically different - consider documenting the generation parameters or version
3. Entry Points Clarity: The new "Entry Points" section shows function calls like "Get_inventory → SimpleVersion" without context about what these represent or where they're located

Positive Observations

1. ✅ Clean Diff: Changes are documentation-only with no code modifications - safe from runtime perspective
2. ✅ Consistent Updates: Both AGENTS.md and ARCHITECTURE.md updated in sync with GitNexus stats
3. ✅ Maintains Structure: Preserves markdown formatting and GitNexus attribution
4. ✅ Version Control: Update timestamp clearly indicates when the documentation was regenerated

Review Summary

Category	Rating
Security	5/5
Code Quality	N/A
Architecture	2/5
Testing	N/A

Rationale:

• Security: Documentation-only change, no security implications
• Architecture: Significant reduction in architectural documentation may impact team understanding and onboarding. The 2/5 rating reflects concern about the loss of valuable system context, not the quality of what remains.

Recommendation: Consider this a documentation strategy decision rather than a routine update. If the new sparse format is intentional (e.g., GitNexus focusing only on entry points and data flow), document this change in a comment or commit message. If comprehensive architecture docs are still valuable, consider maintaining them separately from auto-generated content.

---

Generated by Claude Code Review (AWS Bedrock)

[github-actions]

GitNexus Impact Analysis

⚪ NONE Overall Risk Level

No code files changed — skipping impact analysis.

[Tony363]

LGTM

[Tony363]

LGTM