CLAIMS A1: restore the hypothesis I dropped, and cite the proof that exists - #60
Merged
Conversation
…exists Asked whether the six claims match the original theorem, I read formal/THEOREM-LEDGER.json instead of answering from memory, and found three errors in my own claims document. DROPPED HYPOTHESIS. T1 requires side-consistency, the SAME ASSERTION FUNCTION, and the same root set. A1 stated the first and third and omitted the second. Our rewirings preserve sides by construction so no measurement was affected, but dropping a hypothesis from a claim statement is exactly the defect the ledger records against the repository's original T5 -- 'THE HYPOTHESIS MISSING FROM THE REPOSITORY'S T5', which CE-02 proves necessary. The document written to prevent that error committed it, and the correction is kept visible rather than quietly patched. UNDERSTATED EVIDENCE. T1 is proved_compiled: a Lean proof at formal/lean/MinorityProphetCore/Immunity.lean. A1 cited only finite verification. Recorded with the caveat that no Lean toolchain was available here, so proved_compiled is taken from the ledger rather than rebuilt -- a cheap attack for a reviewer with one. MISATTRIBUTED NOVELTY. The ledger already records 116,032 root-preserving forest rewirings with zero violations. reference_mutant_audit.py REPRODUCES that figure; it does not add to it, and A1 now says so. On the question itself: the theorems have shifted from the paper deliberately, and the ledger tracks each shift with its direction and reason -- two flagged narrowed, two generalized. T1 is generalized; the paper restricted which rewirings counted. What drifted without being recorded was my summary, not the theorems. NEW WEAKNESS C6. gate's minority_prophet/__init__.py says 'properties are proven (see FORMAL.md)' and there is no FORMAL.md in that repository. The proofs are real and live here under formal/, so it is a dangling citation rather than a missing proof -- but a reader checking gate's central claim follows a pointer to nothing. Not fixed here: it is a change to another repository.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Asked whether the six claims match the original theorem, I read
formal/THEOREM-LEDGER.jsoninstead of answering from memory — and found three errors in my own claims document.1. Dropped hypothesis
T1 requires side-consistency, the same assertion function, and the same root set. A1 stated the first and third and omitted the second.
Our rewirings preserve sides by construction, so no measurement was affected. But dropping a hypothesis from a claim statement is exactly the defect the ledger records against the repository’s original T5 —
"THE HYPOTHESIS MISSING FROM THE REPOSITORYS T5", which CE-02 proves is necessary.2. Understated evidence
T1 is
proved_compiled— a Lean proof atformal/lean/MinorityProphetCore/Immunity.lean. A1 cited only finite verification. Now recorded, with the caveat that no Lean toolchain was available in this session, soproved_compiledis taken from the ledger rather than rebuilt. A cheap attack for a reviewer who has one.3. Misattributed novelty
The ledger already records 116,032 root-preserving forest rewirings, 0 violations.
reference_mutant_audit.pyreproduces that figure — it does not add to it. A1 now says so.On the question that prompted this
The theorems have shifted from the paper, deliberately, and the ledger tracks every shift with direction and reason — two flagged
narrowed_from_repository, twogeneralized_from_repository. T1 is generalized: the paper restricted which rewirings counted.What drifted without being recorded was my summary, not the theorems.
New weakness: C6
gate/minority_prophet/__init__.pysays "properties are proven (see FORMAL.md)" — and there is noFORMAL.mdin gate. The proofs are real and live here underformal/, so it is a dangling citation rather than a missing proof. But a reader checking gate’s central claim follows a pointer to nothing.Not fixed here — it is a change to another repository.