feat: agent readiness pass

[Shramkoweb]

Summary

• Add AGENTS.md (with CLAUDE.md as a symlink to it) so agents have a single agent-specific brief.
• Add CODEOWNERS, CONTRIBUTING.md, SECURITY.md, PR template, and 3 issue forms — repo governance scaffolding.
• Rewrite .env.example with descriptions and where-to-obtain notes for every variable.
• Add pnpm verify (fast loop: lint + format:check + typecheck + test:ci) and pnpm verify:full (adds build). Pre-push hook now calls verify instead of an inlined chain.
• Add CodeQL workflow on push/PR/weekly.
• Ignore auto-generated next-env.d.ts in oxfmt (Next.js rewrites it on every build).

Brings the repo to Factory.ai "Level 3 — Production-ready for agents" maturity. No app-code changes, no new runtime dependencies.

Type

• chore — repo-level scaffolding across multiple categories (mostly docs + ci)

Linked spec or plan

Local-only spec at `docs/superpowers/specs/2026-05-04-agent-readiness-design.md` (gitignored). Key decisions:

• Cut Playwright E2E (Checkly already monitors prod).
• Cut auto-fix workflow (pre-commit + pre-push + CI block bad pushes).
• Cut branch-protection.md (UI-configured, doc would just be paperwork).
• `CLAUDE.md` is a symlink, not a duplicate file or `@AGENTS.md` import.

Test plan

• `pnpm verify:full` exits 0 locally
• CodeQL workflow runs successfully on this PR
• Existing CI jobs (`lint`, `typecheck`, `test`, `audit`, `build`) all pass
• Lighthouse comment posts

Breaking changes

None.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
portfolio	Ready	Preview	May 4, 2026 6:39pm

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@Shramkoweb has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 52 minutes and 31 seconds before requesting another review.

To keep reviews running without waiting, you can enable usage-based add-on for your organization. This allows additional reviews beyond the hourly cap. Account admins can enable it under billing.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: c2e4198d-61c9-4d35-956e-a16d8b90257d

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6f79803 and fee70f4.

📒 Files selected for processing (15)

• .env.example
• .git-hooks/pre-push
• .github/CODEOWNERS
• .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.yml
• .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/config.yml
• .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.yml
• .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md
• .oxfmtrc.json
• AGENTS.md
• CLAUDE.md
• CONTRIBUTING.md
• README.md
• README.ua.md
• SECURITY.md
• package.json

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch feat/agent-readiness

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Review rate limit: 0/1 reviews remaining, refill in 52 minutes and 31 seconds.}

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[github-actions]

Lighthouse Results

URL	Perf	A11y	BP	SEO	LCP	FCP	TBT	CLS
/	79	96	96	66	2.32s	0.97s	796ms	0.000
/	96	96	96	66	2.14s	0.92s	182ms	0.000
/blog	88	100	96	63	1.88s	0.98s	449ms	0.000
/blog	88	100	96	63	1.96s	0.91s	443ms	0.000
/about	86	96	93	66	3.58s	1.76s	190ms	0.000
/about	98	96	93	66	2.26s	0.91s	93ms	0.000
/	95	96	96	66	2.14s	0.92s	229ms	0.000
/blog	88	100	96	63	1.96s	0.91s	443ms	0.000
/about	95	96	93	66	2.70s	0.91s	125ms	0.000