Skip to content

[WIP] Adapt docs to latest SciML releases#1488

Open
TorkelE wants to merge 27 commits into
masterfrom
latest_scimlbase_difeq_adaption
Open

[WIP] Adapt docs to latest SciML releases#1488
TorkelE wants to merge 27 commits into
masterfrom
latest_scimlbase_difeq_adaption

Conversation

@TorkelE

@TorkelE TorkelE commented Jun 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

WIP, mostly uploading so that I can work on PR from multiple computers.

@ChrisRackauckas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This is missing the attractors floor?

@TorkelE

TorkelE commented Jun 21, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Yeah, there is a few things missing, but I will add that when I update things for when the new OrdinaryDiffEq.jl is available as I need that anyway.

@ChrisRackauckas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

It should be available now.

@TorkelE

TorkelE commented Jun 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

excellent, will have a go at it thsi afternoon

@TorkelE

TorkelE commented Jun 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Awaiting SciML/OrdinaryDiffEq.jl#3771, but after that this should hopefully be quick work

@TorkelE TorkelE closed this Jun 24, 2026
@TorkelE TorkelE reopened this Jun 24, 2026
@TorkelE TorkelE closed this Jul 3, 2026
@TorkelE TorkelE reopened this Jul 3, 2026
@TorkelE TorkelE closed this Jul 5, 2026
@TorkelE TorkelE reopened this Jul 5, 2026
@ChrisRackauckas

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I wouldn't worry about the QA here, https://github.com/SciML/Catalyst.jl/actions/runs/28762798445/job/85281268352?pr=1488 , that will shortly get replaced the moment you finish this #1487 with a more updated QA setup. The segfault is probably the JET thing that this works around. So, I think this is good sans the modeling LTS failure. That's probably from writing the catalyst equivalence in a way that isn't robust to changing symbolic hashes, i.e. the ordering of the variables x + y vs y + x kind of thing.

@TorkelE

TorkelE commented Jul 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Sounds good, will have a look at that failure and merge later today I hope.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants