Skip to content

style: apply Runic v1.7.0 formatting#129

Merged
ChrisRackauckas merged 1 commit into
SciML:mainfrom
ChrisRackauckas-Claude:run-runic-formatting
Jun 7, 2026
Merged

style: apply Runic v1.7.0 formatting#129
ChrisRackauckas merged 1 commit into
SciML:mainfrom
ChrisRackauckas-Claude:run-runic-formatting

Conversation

@ChrisRackauckas-Claude

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

The Runic Format Check CI (fredrikekre/runic-action@v1, Runic v1.7.0) is currently failing on main because the tree is not conformant to Runic v1.7.0.

This PR applies Runic v1.7.0 formatting over the whole repository to make the check pass. It is pure formatting — no logic, identifier, or value changes. 4 files were reformatted:

  • mwe.jl
  • src/ast.jl
  • src/evaluator.jl
  • test/test_antlr_parser.jl

Changes are limited to whitespace alignment, function-call argument bracket layout, and indentation. After applying, a Runic v1.7.0 --check pass over all 16 .jl files reports zero remaining diffs.

This is a separate, self-contained formatting PR so it can be reviewed and merged independently of any other work. No CI/Project.toml/non-.jl files were touched.


Note: please ignore this PR until reviewed by @ChrisRackauckas.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Pure formatting changes to make the Runic Format Check pass. The repo's
FormatCheck CI uses fredrikekre/runic-action@v1 (Runic v1.7.0), and the
tree was non-conformant. This applies Runic v1.7.0 over the whole tree;
no logic changes.

Co-Authored-By: Chris Rackauckas <accounts@chrisrackauckas.com>

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@ChrisRackauckas ChrisRackauckas marked this pull request as ready for review June 7, 2026 08:16
@ChrisRackauckas ChrisRackauckas merged commit 6619255 into SciML:main Jun 7, 2026
8 of 10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants