Referee-proofread and harden the Erdős 625 manuscript - #58
Draft
SamPetkov wants to merge 20 commits into
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Purpose
This PR is stacked on #57. It performs a second, referee-oriented pass over the self-contained Erdős 625 manuscript. The goal is not cosmetic expansion: it reduces the amount of notation a reader must hold at once, replaces several compressed proof interfaces by exact statements, and makes the quantitative constant independently reproducible.
The theorem status remains fail-closed. This PR improves publication readiness but does not promote the full-sequence theorem until the mathematical and Lean gates in Appendix A are closed on one integrated commit.
Readability pass
Theorem 0.1;proofenvironments;log 2notation and several dense transitions without changing hypotheses or summation domains.Section 8 hardening
The high-cell section now follows the valid order of operations explicitly:
The square-free endpoint comparison now has a proof. It derives the local atom ratio, the identity
the ambient falling-factorial inequality, and the cancellation producing the
Q_ijfactors. The section also isolates the reusable finite core that works for any finite endpoint alphabet with matching-supported selected cells.Section 9 hardening
The former informal “thresholds of F” phrase is replaced by an exact function
Phi_F(r'), and the cycle-space expansion is an equality before expectation.The joint prescribed-cell estimate is derived from factorial moments. This makes explicit why demands in cells sharing rows or columns may be expanded simultaneously.
The estimate
is now a named lemma with a complete proof based on log-convexity and endpoint control. The upper endpoint contributes
in the exponent. The complementary residual regime now derives separately the local-reward and cycle-space bounds before combining them.
Exact constant ledger
Adds
625/experiments/check_constant_ledger_v3.py, which verifies the strengthened four-support certificate using exact rational arithmetic. It encloses2^(1/20)by two rationals whose twentieth powers bracket 2, boundslog 2by a rational series with an exact remainder, and checks the mean bracket, four omitted-tail bounds, and the final139/500ledger without floating-point decisions.The final section now explains this certificate in the paper and uses a deterministic error sequence in the phase-resolved probability statement.
Publication-rank boundary
The accompanying audit records the distinction between presentation quality and theorem status. If the full-sequence theorem closes as stated, the contribution resolves the exceptional phase left by the existing approximately-95%-of-integers result and gives a quantitative
n/(log n)^3lower bound. The remaining rank-limiting work is therefore closure and independent replay of:Validation
The dedicated workflow now:
Phi_Finterface and quadratic-activity lemma;A green workflow validates the manuscript assembly, exact constant ledger, and editorial invariants. It does not substitute for the remaining mathematical closure gates.