fix: benchmark results file is too large. Not saving it anymore

[RianKoja]

No description provided.

[gemini-code-assist]

Note

Gemini is unable to generate a summary for this pull request due to the file types involved not being currently supported.

[coderabbitai]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Internal CI/CD workflow optimization with no impact on end-user features or functionality.

_{✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.}

Walkthrough

The GitHub Actions benchmark workflow step that uploads benchmark results as artifacts is removed. Other workflow steps for profiling reports and summary actions remain intact. No new logic, branching, or error handling is introduced.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
GitHub Actions Workflow \.github/workflows/benchmark\.yml	Removed the artifact upload step for benchmark results; profiling report uploads and summary-related actions preserved.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description check	❓ Inconclusive	No description was provided, making it impossible to assess whether it relates to the changeset.	Add a description explaining the rationale for removing the benchmark artifact upload and any context around the file size issue.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title directly addresses the main change: removing benchmark result uploads due to file size constraints.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch fix/benchmark_artifact_too_large

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 13e759c and b4a690d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .github/workflows/benchmark.yml (0 hunks)

💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)

• .github/workflows/benchmark.yml

Tip

📝 Customizable high-level summaries are now available in beta!

You can now customize how CodeRabbit generates the high-level summary in your pull requests — including its content, structure, tone, and formatting.

• Provide your own instructions using the high_level_summary_instructions setting.
• Format the summary however you like (bullet lists, tables, multi-section layouts, contributor stats, etc.).
• Use high_level_summary_in_walkthrough to move the summary from the description to the walkthrough section.

Example instruction:

"Divide the high-level summary into five sections:

1. 📝 Description — Summarize the main change in 50–60 words, explaining what was done.
2. 📓 References — List relevant issues, discussions, documentation, or related PRs.
3. 📦 Dependencies & Requirements — Mention any new/updated dependencies, environment variable changes, or configuration updates.
4. 📊 Contributor Summary — Include a Markdown table showing contributions:
   | Contributor | Lines Added | Lines Removed | Files Changed |
5. ✔️ Additional Notes — Add any extra reviewer context.
   Keep each section concise (under 200 words) and use bullet or numbered lists for clarity."

Note: This feature is currently in beta for Pro-tier users, and pricing will be announced later.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}