Skip to content

[polyopt] Fox: thermodynamic-limit certificate for the triangular J1-J2 bulk gap - #285

Open
hungry-foolish-12138 wants to merge 2 commits into
QuantumBFS:mainfrom
hungry-foolish-12138:challenge/polyopt-triangular-gap-fox
Open

[polyopt] Fox: thermodynamic-limit certificate for the triangular J1-J2 bulk gap#285
hungry-foolish-12138 wants to merge 2 commits into
QuantumBFS:mainfrom
hungry-foolish-12138:challenge/polyopt-triangular-gap-fox

Conversation

@hungry-foolish-12138

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Team

Team name Fox
Members 肖元; 冷昊阳

Challenge

Row
Challenge Can the reported ~0.3 J1 triangular spin-liquid gap survive a boundary-free thermodynamic-limit certificate?
Catalog issue Addresses #88 — Certified bulk spectral-gap bounds for frustrated spin-1/2 models.
Track tracks/polyopt/

Result

We turn the reported ~0.3 J1 gap at J2/J1 = 0.10 into a boundary-free thermodynamic-limit SDP certificate search.

  • Eight d=1 Rung-A instances have independently verified exact primal witnesses.
  • The d=2 Rung-A instance is constructed exactly: 60,467 variables, 507 affine equalities, and PSD block dimensions [1430, 506].
  • No certified-infeasible point was obtained; the scientific verdict is explicitly inconclusive, not a claimed gap bound.
  • The submission includes an independent exact/interval certificate verifier, full source and tests in the attached archive, machine-readable audit artifacts, and a human-facing mathematical report.

Reproduce

See tracks/polyopt/solutions/Fox/README.md. The adjacent archive contains the full source, tests, and audit artifacts; verify it using SHA256SUMS.

This contribution establishes a reproducible certificate pipeline and sharpens the remaining open problem without turning solver failure into physics.

Add detailed README for the Fox solution exploring thermodynamic limits of the triangular lattice model.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant