fix(onboarding): add missing info type to CalloutBox component#54711
Merged
Conversation
assign-reviewers-posthog
Bot
requested review from
a team,
MattBro,
fercgomes and
rafaeelaudibert
and removed request for
a team
Contributor
|
Size Change: -835 B (0%) Total Size: 129 MB ℹ️ View Unchanged
|
Contributor
|
Reviews (1): Last reviewed commit: "fix(onboarding): add missing info type t..." | Re-trigger Greptile |
andrewm4894
approved these changes
Apr 15, 2026
rnegron
approved these changes
Apr 15, 2026
gantoine
approved these changes
Apr 15, 2026
Contributor
|
🎭 Playwright report · View test results →
These issues are not necessarily caused by your changes. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Problem
PR #53668 introduced
<CalloutBox type="info">across 28 LLM analytics onboarding docs files, but theCalloutBoxcomponent type only accepts'action' | 'fyi' | 'caution'. This breakstypescript:checkCI for every PR rebased on master.How did you test this code?
Tests