Add ClawClip to observability tools

[Ylsssq926]

ClawClip is a lightweight local alternative for session replay and cost analysis — a good starting point before setting up full LangFuse infrastructure.

What it adds:

• Zero infrastructure (no Docker/databases needed)
• Reads local OpenClaw/ZeroClaw logs
• Shows replay, scorecard, and cost breakdown
• Answers: did my agent get better or just more expensive?

Where it fits:
Added to Part 20 (Observability) as the first tool to try, before LangFuse. For single-agent optimization, ClawClip is often enough.

Links:

• GitHub: https://github.com/Ylsssq926/clawclip
• Live Demo: https://clawclip.luelan.online

[devin-ai-integration]

Thanks for the contribution! Flagging a few things for the maintainer to weigh (this is a maintainer call, not a merge-blocker I can decide):

Framing vs. CONTRIBUTING. CONTRIBUTING asks that claims stay "concrete and cite your source (a release note, a config key, a measurement)" and avoid marketing copy. The current copy ("a good starting point," "often enough," "the first tool to try, before LangFuse") reads as a recommendation/endorsement of a third-party tool rather than a sourced, verifiable claim. Slotting it ahead of LangFuse in a core part (Part 20) is a strong editorial endorsement of a tool the guide hasn't independently verified.

Better home: AWESOME.md. The repo already has a curated ecosystem list for exactly this — third-party skills, tools, and observability stacks. A neutral one-line entry there ("ClawClip — local session replay + cost breakdown, reads local OpenClaw logs; no infra") fits the established pattern far better than a promoted slot inside Part 20.

Verifiability. The links (github.com/Ylsssq926/clawclip, clawclip.luelan.online) are external, so CI's lychee --offline doesn't check them. Before listing, it'd be worth the maintainer confirming the repo is real, maintained, and does what it claims.

Recommendation: move this to a neutral AWESOME.md entry (pending a quick legitimacy check) rather than an endorsement in Part 20. I'll defer to @OnlyTerp on the final decision.