python3Packages.torchtune: skip failing tests on x86_64-linux

[GaetanLepage]

Things done

        path = os.fspath(path)  # AOTIModelPackageLoader expects (str, str)
>       loader = torch._C._aoti.AOTIModelPackageLoader(
            path, model_name, run_single_threaded, num_runners, device_index
        )
E       RuntimeError: Error in dlopen: /tmp/YrvJIS/tpe/data/aotinductor/model/c6obodzaot56wszmluag42nfsd46qixeii2siknbrzoxk4iydrpc.wrapper.so: cannot enable executable stack as shared object requires: Invalid argument

device_index = -1
model_name = 'model'
num_runners = 1
path       = '/build/tmpak4zd9oh/tpe.pt2'
run_single_threaded = False

• Built on platform:
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS tests in nixos/tests.
  • Package tests at passthru.tests.
  • Tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test for functions and "core" functionality.
• Ran nixpkgs-review on this PR. See nixpkgs-review usage.
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files, usually in ./result/bin/.
• Nixpkgs Release Notes
  • Package update: when the change is major or breaking.
• NixOS Release Notes
  • Module addition: when adding a new NixOS module.
  • Module update: when the change is significant.
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md, pkgs/README.md, maintainers/README.md and other READMEs.

[GaetanLepage]

nixpkgs-review result

Generated using nixpkgs-review.

Command: nixpkgs-review pr 482990
Commit: ed6b0a3c1a285be898f4ade539aadd61f31e386b

---

x86_64-linux

✅ 4 packages built:

• python313Packages.executorch
• python313Packages.executorch.dist
• python313Packages.torchtune
• python313Packages.torchtune.dist

[NickCao]

So this is caused by aotinductor (from torch) creating so with executable stack, is it possible to fix the root cause?

[GaetanLepage]

So this is caused by aotinductor (from torch) creating so with executable stack, is it possible to fix the root cause?

That would be great indeed. For now, I have absolutely no idea what would be the underlying cause.
I heavily suspect this being a regression brought by #479279.

If anyone has an idea, please feel free to chime in :)