Skip to content

[build] chore: bump transformer-engine to release_v2.16.post#4536

Open
ko3n1g wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
ko3n1g/build/bump-te-release_v2.16.post
Open

[build] chore: bump transformer-engine to release_v2.16.post#4536
ko3n1g wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
ko3n1g/build/bump-te-release_v2.16.post

Conversation

@ko3n1g

@ko3n1g ko3n1g commented Jun 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Background

Bumps TransformerEngine from the release_v2.16_post head (d64bc14, landed in #4527) to the newer release_v2.16.post head (b9d690e). Upstream re-cut the post branch under the dotted name; this re-points main at it. Companion bumps: Megatron-Bridge r0.5.0 (#4535), Megatron-LM main + core_r0.18.0.

What changed

  • override-dependencies TE pin d64bc14db9d690e0 (release_v2.16.post head).
  • Regenerated uv.lock (TE entry only).

Details

  • pyproject.toml:132transformer-engine @ git+...@b9d690e042b1c4e455214e7dab65d6d3512c05d6.
  • uv.locktransformer-engine 2.16.0+d64bc14d2.16.0+b9d690e0; TE's transitive dependencies unchanged. Lockfile stays revision = 2.
  • Relocked in-container (uv lock).

Tested

  • uv lock clean: Resolved 345 packages, Updated transformer-engine v2.16.0+d64bc14d -> v2.16.0+b9d690e0.
  • needs-more-tests + full-test-suite applied (TE is high-blast-radius).

Signed-off-by: oliver könig <okoenig@nvidia.com>
@ko3n1g ko3n1g requested a review from a team as a code owner June 26, 2026 22:31
@ko3n1g ko3n1g added needs-more-tests Requires additional L0 and L1 test coverage before merge full-test-suite labels Jun 26, 2026
@claude

claude Bot commented Jun 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

LGTM — clean TE pin bump (d64bc14db9d690e0, both release_v2.16.post). Version stays 2.16.0, lockfile update is consistent, no transitive dependency changes. Labels needs-more-tests + full-test-suite are correctly applied for blast radius.

Suggested test cases

No perf tests impacted — no recipe or performance configs were changed in this PR. CI coverage via the needs-more-tests and full-test-suite labels (L0+L1+L2) is the appropriate validation for a TE bump.

@yaoyu-33 yaoyu-33 added area:build Dependencies, packaging, images, and environment setup ci CI, automation, test queue, or workflow infrastructure work needs-review PR is ready for code review and waiting on a reviewer labels Jun 26, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area:build Dependencies, packaging, images, and environment setup ci CI, automation, test queue, or workflow infrastructure work full-test-suite needs-more-tests Requires additional L0 and L1 test coverage before merge needs-review PR is ready for code review and waiting on a reviewer

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants