Skip to content

Make reviewer own journal-grounded workflow - #22

Merged
HosungYou merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
reviewer-evidence-workflow
Jul 2, 2026
Merged

Make reviewer own journal-grounded workflow#22
HosungYou merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
reviewer-evidence-workflow

Conversation

@HosungYou

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

  • make longtable-reviewer the compact visible surface for peer-review plus editor-style journal fit feedback
  • fold Journal Editor, Venue Strategist, and scholar-research evidence expectations into the reviewer workflow
  • add role-audit coverage for Codex skills, Claude skills, CLI reviewer prompts, and prompt aliases
  • bump packages to 0.1.72 and document the release

Verification

  • npm run release:check
  • npm audit --omit=dev
  • git diff --check
  • reinstalled Codex and Claude compact skills locally and verified longtable-reviewer includes Journal Profile, Reference Pattern Matrix, Venue Strategist, scholar-research, Figure/Table, and APA 7 markers

@HosungYou
HosungYou merged commit 4725f65 into main Jul 2, 2026
1 check passed
@HosungYou
HosungYou deleted the reviewer-evidence-workflow branch July 2, 2026 04:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant