cherry-pick: feat(threads): graceful drain hook for in-flight work before worker shutdown (conflicts → v5.1)#1728
Merged
Merged
Conversation
feat(threads): graceful drain hook for in-flight work before worker shutdown
The automated cherry-pick left raw diff markers in the export list. Kept this PR's own additions (extendShutdownDeadline, restoreShutdownDeadline); dropped registerWorkerDataProvider, which isn't defined anywhere in this branch or on v5.1 — it's collateral from this core branch having absorbed an unrelated main merge (PR #1559's worker-data-hook work) along the way.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Cherry-pick of PR #1621 onto `v5.1` produced conflicts on commit(s): `9018760e480a61e54d280eb07e93fa26c96c9a0b`.
Resolve the conflict markers on branch `cherry-pick/v5.1/pr-1621` and merge this PR.
@claude please review branch `cherry-pick/v5.1/pr-1621` and suggest a patch that resolves the conflict markers (
<<<<<<</=======/>>>>>>>) introduced by cherry-picking PR #1621 onto `v5.1`. Post the suggested patch as a comment here — do not push.