Add SECURITY.md for vulnerability disclosure - #64
Closed
dmchaledev wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
Conversation
The repo had no vulnerability reporting process for its executable surface (customize.sh, CI workflow) despite being a security-policy project. Routes reports through GitHub private security advisories and clarifies that policy-content corrections belong in regular issues.
Contributor
Author
|
Superseded by #60 (merged) — main already has SECURITY.md; this PR's content is identical after rebase (zero diff vs main). |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
This repo ships a security-policy project but had no vulnerability disclosure
process of its own — no
SECURITY.md, and no mention of one anywhere in thedocs. While the templates themselves are static Markdown, the repo does have
an executable attack surface:
scripts/customize.sh(Bash, does fileread/write based on user-supplied flags) and
.github/workflows/ci.yml.SECURITY.mdwith:scripts/customize.shand CI workflow config are in scope;factual/compliance corrections to policy content are explicitly out of
scope and should go through regular issues instead.
Advisory flow, so nothing sensitive lands in a public issue.
branches exist).
Test plan
SECURITY.md,SECURITYtab guidance, orsecurity-contact info existed anywhere in the repo before this change
../../security/advisories/newand../../issuesresolve correctly from a repo-rootSECURITY.mdonGitHub
Generated by Claude Code