Skip to content

[DMS-1250] Support running DMS from Visual Studio#1070

Open
axelmarquezh wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
DMS-1250
Open

[DMS-1250] Support running DMS from Visual Studio#1070
axelmarquezh wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
DMS-1250

Conversation

@axelmarquezh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@axelmarquezh axelmarquezh marked this pull request as ready for review July 1, 2026 01:41
<PropertyGroup>
<_DmsNetCoreSdkRoot Condition="'$(NETCoreSdkBundledVersionsProps)' != ''">$([System.IO.Path]::GetFullPath('$(NETCoreSdkBundledVersionsProps)/..'))</_DmsNetCoreSdkRoot>
<_DmsNetCoreSdkRoot Condition="'$(_DmsNetCoreSdkRoot)' == '' and '$(MSBuildRuntimeType)' == 'Core'">$(MSBuildToolsPath)</_DmsNetCoreSdkRoot>
<_DmsNewtonsoftJsonPath>$(_DmsNetCoreSdkRoot)/Sdks/Microsoft.NET.Sdk/tools/net472/Newtonsoft.Json.dll</_DmsNewtonsoftJsonPath>

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Disappointing to see Newtonsoft back in DMS. Is that the whole reason we don't support Visual Studio? If so, we should get rid of Newtonsoft (again). And add to the AGENTS.md to use System.Text.Json instead.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1

@bradbanister bradbanister left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

See below

return false;
}

JObject manifest;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is the actual problem. This embedded C# code should not be using Newtonsoft.Json

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants