Skip to content

Add franchisesystems.ai email-sending template#1362

Open
bill0x2A wants to merge 2 commits into
Domain-Connect:masterfrom
bill0x2A:franchisesystems-ai-email-sending
Open

Add franchisesystems.ai email-sending template#1362
bill0x2A wants to merge 2 commits into
Domain-Connect:masterfrom
bill0x2A:franchisesystems-ai-email-sending

Conversation

@bill0x2A

@bill0x2A bill0x2A commented Jul 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Description

New template for Franchise Systems AI franchisesystems.ai- a SaaS platform for franchise management. Our customers (mostly US small-business franchise brands) connect their own domains to send email from our platform (Resend / Amazon SES-backed). The template configures the return-path MX + SPF on the send subdomain, one DKIM TXT, and an optional DMARC baseline record.

Notes for review:

  • Sync flow only, signed requests (RSA-SHA256); public key published at _dck1.franchisesystems.ai.
  • Records are split into four groups (return-path, dkim, spf, dmarc). Our service currently requests groupId=return-path,dkim,spf; the dmarc group is applied selectively per domain (only where no DMARC policy exists yet).
  • Customers frequently use subdomains as sending domains, so the host-set case is a first-class path for us (second editor test below).

Type of change

  • New template
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue in the template)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality to the template)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing template behavior to be not backward compatible)

How Has This Been Tested?

  • Template functionality checked using Online Editor
  • Template file name follows the pattern <providerId>.<serviceId>.json
  • resource URL provided with logoUrl is actually served by a webserver

Checklist of common problems

  • syncPubKeyDomain is set
  • warnPhishing is not set alongside syncPubKeyDomain
  • syncRedirectDomain is set (the synchronous flow uses redirect_uri)
  • no TXT record contains SPF content — SPF is delivered via the SPFM record type
  • txtConflictMatchingMode is set on every TXT record that must be unique per label or content prefix: the DKIM TXT uses All (a selector must hold exactly one key — re-applying after key rotation replaces the stale key), the DMARC TXT uses Prefix on v=DMARC1
  • no variable is used as a bare full record value — the DKIM record data is p=%dkim%
  • no bare variable is used as the full host label — all hosts are fixed (send, resend._domainkey, _dmarc)
  • no variable is used in the host field to create a subdomain — subdomain sending domains use the host request parameter
  • %host% does not appear explicitly in any host attribute
  • essential is set to OnApply on the DMARC record (users may strengthen or remove their DMARC policy without breaking the template)

Online Editor test results

Editor test link(s):

Test franchisesystems.ai/email-sending example.com/@

Test franchisesystems.ai/email-sending example.com/mail

Test franchisesystems.ai/email-sending example.com/@ — all groups incl. dmarc

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

JSON Filename Check Passed

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

JSON Schema Validation Passed

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

PR Description Check Passed

All required sections are filled in correctly.

Details
  OK  Type of change: 1/4 checkboxes ticked
  OK  How Has This Been Tested?: all 3 checkboxes ticked
  OK  Checklist of common problems: 10/10 checkboxes ticked
  OK  Online Editor test results: 3 link(s) found
  OK  Template coverage: all 1 template(s) covered
Labels to remove: Checklist of common problems not complete, Forged editor links, PR description incomplete, Test links missing

PR description check PASSED

@bill0x2A bill0x2A marked this pull request as draft July 10, 2026 14:39
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Linter OK

franchisesystems.ai.email-sending.json

Level Code Note

@bill0x2A bill0x2A marked this pull request as ready for review July 10, 2026 14:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant