fix(trace_exporter: shared_runtime): unwrap_or being eager is not good by Aaalibaba42 · Pull Request #1983 · DataDog/libdatadog

Aaalibaba42 · 2026-05-13T16:59:50Z

No description provided.

github-actions · 2026-05-13T17:01:42Z

📚 Documentation Check Results

⚠️ 1032 documentation warning(s) found

📦 `libdd-data-pipeline` - 1032 warning(s)

Updated: 2026-05-13 18:40:53 UTC | Commit: 9a9eb16 | missing-docs job results

github-actions · 2026-05-13T17:02:17Z

Clippy Allow Annotation Report

Comparing clippy allow annotations between branches:

Base Branch: origin/main
PR Branch: origin/jwiriath/shared_runtime-lazy

Summary by Rule

Rule	Base Branch	PR Branch	Change

Annotation Counts by File

File	Base Branch	PR Branch	Change

Annotation Stats by Crate

Crate	Base Branch	PR Branch	Change
`clippy-annotation-reporter`	5	5	No change (0%)
`datadog-ffe-ffi`	1	1	No change (0%)
`datadog-ipc`	21	21	No change (0%)
`datadog-live-debugger`	6	6	No change (0%)
`datadog-live-debugger-ffi`	10	10	No change (0%)
`datadog-profiling-replayer`	4	4	No change (0%)
`datadog-remote-config`	3	3	No change (0%)
`datadog-sidecar`	57	57	No change (0%)
`libdd-common`	13	13	No change (0%)
`libdd-common-ffi`	12	12	No change (0%)
`libdd-data-pipeline`	5	5	No change (0%)
`libdd-ddsketch`	2	2	No change (0%)
`libdd-dogstatsd-client`	1	1	No change (0%)
`libdd-profiling`	13	13	No change (0%)
`libdd-telemetry`	20	20	No change (0%)
`libdd-tinybytes`	4	4	No change (0%)
`libdd-trace-normalization`	2	2	No change (0%)
`libdd-trace-obfuscation`	8	8	No change (0%)
`libdd-trace-stats`	1	1	No change (0%)
`libdd-trace-utils`	15	15	No change (0%)
Total	203	203	No change (0%)

About This Report

This report tracks Clippy allow annotations for specific rules, showing how they've changed in this PR. Decreasing the number of these annotations generally improves code quality.

github-actions · 2026-05-13T17:03:37Z

🔒 Cargo Deny Results

⚠️ 5 issue(s) found, showing only errors (advisories, bans, sources)

📦 `libdd-data-pipeline` - 5 error(s)

Show output

error[unsound]: Rand is unsound with a custom logger using `rand::rng()`
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:212:1
    │
212 │ rand 0.8.5 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ unsound advisory detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0097
    ├ It has been reported (by @lopopolo) that the `rand` library is [unsound](https://rust-lang.github.io/unsafe-code-guidelines/glossary.html#soundness-of-code--of-a-library) (i.e. that safe code using the public API can cause Undefined Behaviour) when all the following conditions are met:
      
      - The `log` and `thread_rng` features are enabled
      - A [custom logger](https://docs.rs/log/latest/log/#implementing-a-logger) is defined
      - The custom logger accesses `rand::rng()` (previously `rand::thread_rng()`) and calls any `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods on `ThreadRng`
      - The `ThreadRng` (attempts to) reseed while called from the custom logger (this happens every 64 kB of generated data)
      - Trace-level logging is enabled or warn-level logging is enabled and the random source (the `getrandom` crate) is unable to provide a new seed
      
      `TryRng` (previously `RngCore`) methods for `ThreadRng` use `unsafe` code to cast `*mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>` to `&mut BlockRng<ReseedingCore>`. When all the above conditions are met this results in an aliased mutable reference, violating the Stacked Borrows rules. Miri is able to detect this violation in sample code. Since construction of [aliased mutable references is Undefined Behaviour](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/nomicon/references.html), the behaviour of optimized builds is hard to predict.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/rust-random/rand/pull/1763
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.10.1 OR <0.10.0, >=0.9.3 OR <0.9.0, >=0.8.6 (try `cargo update -p rand`)
    ├ rand v0.8.5
      ├── libdd-common v4.0.0
      │   ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v1.0.0
      │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1
      │   │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v0.1.0
      │   │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0
      │   │   │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
      │   │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0
      │   │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
      │   │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
      │   │   └── libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1
      │   │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0
      │   │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
      │   │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
      │   │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v2.0.0
      │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v0.1.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0 (*)
      │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-trace-normalization v2.0.0
      │   └── libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1 (*)
      ├── (dev) libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
      ├── libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1 (*)
      └── proptest v1.5.0
          └── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.0
              ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
              ├── (dev) libdd-tinybytes v1.1.0 (*)
              └── libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints for URI names were incorrectly accepted
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:236:1
    │
236 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0098
    ├ Name constraints for URI names were ignored and therefore accepted.
      
      Note this library does not provide an API for asserting URI names, and URI name constraints are otherwise not implemented.  URI name constraints are now rejected unconditionally.
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-965h-392x-2mh5). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.0.0
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v1.0.0
          │       │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1
          │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v0.1.0
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0
          │       │   │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0
          │       │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1
          │       │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0
          │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v2.0.0
          │       │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v0.1.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       └── libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.0.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.0.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Name constraints were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:236:1
    │
236 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0099
    ├ Permitted subtree name constraints for DNS names were accepted for certificates asserting a wildcard name.
      
      This was incorrect because, given a name constraint of `accept.example.com`, `*.example.com` could feasibly allow a name of `reject.example.com` which is outside the constraint.
      This is very similar to [CVE-2025-61727](https://go.dev/issue/76442).
      
      Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
      
      This vulnerability is identified as [GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh](https://github.com/rustls/webpki/security/advisories/GHSA-xgp8-3hg3-c2mh). Thank you to @1seal for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.12, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.6 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.0.0
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v1.0.0
          │       │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1
          │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v0.1.0
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0
          │       │   │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0
          │       │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1
          │       │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0
          │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v2.0.0
          │       │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v0.1.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       └── libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.0.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.0.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Reachable panic in certificate revocation list parsing
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:236:1
    │
236 │ rustls-webpki 0.103.10 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0104
    ├ A panic was reachable when parsing certificate revocation lists via [`BorrowedCertRevocationList::from_der`]
      or [`OwnedCertRevocationList::from_der`].  This was the result of mishandling a syntactically valid empty
      `BIT STRING` appearing in the `onlySomeReasons` element of a `IssuingDistributionPoint` CRL extension.
      
      This panic is reachable prior to a CRL's signature being verified.
      
      Applications that do not use CRLs are not affected.
      
      Thank you to @tynus3 for the report.
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.103.13, <0.104.0-alpha.1 OR >=0.104.0-alpha.7 (try `cargo update -p rustls-webpki`)
    ├ rustls-webpki v0.103.10
      └── rustls v0.23.37
          ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7
          │   └── libdd-common v4.0.0
          │       ├── libdd-capabilities-impl v1.0.0
          │       │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1
          │       │   ├── libdd-shared-runtime v0.1.0
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0
          │       │   │   │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │   │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0
          │       │   │       └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │   ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │   └── libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1
          │       │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0
          │       │       │   └── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       │       └── (dev) libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-dogstatsd-client v2.0.0
          │       │   └── libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-shared-runtime v0.1.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-telemetry v5.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-obfuscation v2.0.0 (*)
          │       ├── libdd-trace-stats v2.0.0 (*)
          │       └── libdd-trace-utils v3.0.1 (*)
          ├── libdd-common v4.0.0 (*)
          └── tokio-rustls v0.26.0
              ├── hyper-rustls v0.27.7 (*)
              └── libdd-common v4.0.0 (*)

error[vulnerability]: Denial of Service via Stack Exhaustion
    ┌─ /home/runner/work/libdatadog/libdatadog/Cargo.lock:276:1
    │
276 │ time 0.3.41 registry+https://github.com/rust-lang/crates.io-index
    │ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ security vulnerability detected
    │
    ├ ID: RUSTSEC-2026-0009
    ├ Advisory: https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0009
    ├ ## Impact
      
      When user-provided input is provided to any type that parses with the RFC 2822 format, a denial of
      service attack via stack exhaustion is possible. The attack relies on formally deprecated and
      rarely-used features that are part of the RFC 2822 format used in a malicious manner. Ordinary,
      non-malicious input will never encounter this scenario.
      
      ## Patches
      
      A limit to the depth of recursion was added in v0.3.47. From this version, an error will be returned
      rather than exhausting the stack.
      
      ## Workarounds
      
      Limiting the length of user input is the simplest way to avoid stack exhaustion, as the amount of
      the stack consumed would be at most a factor of the length of the input.
    ├ Announcement: https://github.com/time-rs/time/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md#0347-2026-02-05
    ├ Solution: Upgrade to >=0.3.47 (try `cargo update -p time`)
    ├ time v0.3.41
      └── tracing-appender v0.2.3
          └── libdd-log v1.0.0
              └── (dev) libdd-data-pipeline v3.0.1

advisories FAILED, bans ok, sources ok

Updated: 2026-05-13 18:42:42 UTC | Commit: 9a9eb16 | dependency-check job results

datadog-official · 2026-05-13T17:14:37Z

🎉 All green!

❄️ No new flaky tests detected
🧪 All tests passed

🎯 Code Coverage (details)
• Patch Coverage: 60.00%
• Overall Coverage: 72.52% (-0.02%)

_{This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.

🔗 Commit SHA: 5dfca6c | Docs | Datadog PR Page | Give us feedback!}

codecov-commenter · 2026-05-13T17:14:44Z

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 60.00000% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 72.52%. Comparing base (a673a53) to head (5dfca6c).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1983      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   72.68%   72.52%   -0.16%     
==========================================
  Files         451      451              
  Lines       74255    74479     +224     
==========================================
+ Hits        53971    54015      +44     
- Misses      20284    20464     +180

Components	Coverage Δ
libdd-crashtracker	`65.32% <ø> (+0.01%)`	⬆️
libdd-crashtracker-ffi	`37.68% <ø> (ø)`
libdd-alloc	`98.77% <ø> (ø)`
libdd-data-pipeline	`86.00% <60.00%> (+0.03%)`	⬆️
libdd-data-pipeline-ffi	`71.04% <ø> (ø)`
libdd-common	`79.81% <ø> (ø)`
libdd-common-ffi	`74.41% <ø> (ø)`
libdd-telemetry	`73.34% <ø> (ø)`
libdd-telemetry-ffi	`31.36% <ø> (ø)`
libdd-dogstatsd-client	`82.64% <ø> (ø)`
datadog-ipc	`76.22% <ø> (+1.46%)`	⬆️
libdd-profiling	`81.57% <ø> (ø)`
libdd-profiling-ffi	`64.51% <ø> (ø)`
libdd-sampling	`97.25% <ø> (ø)`
datadog-sidecar	`29.09% <ø> (+<0.01%)`	⬆️
datdog-sidecar-ffi	`9.67% <ø> (ø)`
spawn-worker	`48.86% <ø> (-5.83%)`	⬇️
libdd-tinybytes	`93.16% <ø> (ø)`
libdd-trace-normalization	`81.71% <ø> (ø)`
libdd-trace-obfuscation	`87.39% <ø> (ø)`
libdd-trace-protobuf	`68.25% <ø> (ø)`
libdd-trace-utils	`88.85% <ø> (ø)`
libdd-tracer-flare	`86.88% <ø> (ø)`
libdd-log	`74.83% <ø> (ø)`

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

dd-octo-sts · 2026-05-13T17:33:45Z

Artifact Size Benchmark Report

aarch64-alpine-linux-musl

Artifact	Baseline	Commit	Change
/aarch64-alpine-linux-musl/lib/libdatadog_profiling.a	81.84 MB	81.84 MB	-0% (-3.40 KB) 👌
/aarch64-alpine-linux-musl/lib/libdatadog_profiling.so	7.57 MB	7.57 MB	0% (0 B) 👌

aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu

Artifact	Baseline	Commit	Change
/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libdatadog_profiling.so	10.01 MB	10.01 MB	--.01% (-1.64 KB) 💪
/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libdatadog_profiling.a	98.03 MB	98.03 MB	-0% (-6.21 KB) 👌

libdatadog-x64-windows

Artifact	Baseline	Commit	Change
/libdatadog-x64-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.dll	24.48 MB	24.48 MB	0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x64-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib	79.87 KB	79.87 KB	0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x64-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.pdb	180.21 MB	180.22 MB	+0% (+8.00 KB) 👌
/libdatadog-x64-windows/debug/static/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib	913.96 MB	913.95 MB	-0% (-2.22 KB) 👌
/libdatadog-x64-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.dll	7.73 MB	7.73 MB	-0% (-512 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x64-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib	79.87 KB	79.87 KB	0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x64-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.pdb	23.17 MB	23.16 MB	--.03% (-8.00 KB) 💪
/libdatadog-x64-windows/release/static/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib	45.36 MB	45.36 MB	--.02% (-9.95 KB) 💪

libdatadog-x86-windows

Artifact	Baseline	Commit	Change
/libdatadog-x86-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.dll	21.09 MB	21.09 MB	-0% (-512 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x86-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib	81.11 KB	81.11 KB	0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x86-windows/debug/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.pdb	184.41 MB	184.39 MB	-0% (-16.00 KB) 👌
/libdatadog-x86-windows/debug/static/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib	900.43 MB	900.43 MB	-0% (-2.00 KB) 👌
/libdatadog-x86-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.dll	5.99 MB	5.99 MB	-0% (-512 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x86-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib	81.11 KB	81.11 KB	0% (0 B) 👌
/libdatadog-x86-windows/release/dynamic/datadog_profiling_ffi.pdb	24.81 MB	24.80 MB	--.03% (-8.00 KB) 💪
/libdatadog-x86-windows/release/static/datadog_profiling_ffi.lib	42.87 MB	42.86 MB	--.02% (-10.66 KB) 💪

x86_64-alpine-linux-musl

Artifact	Baseline	Commit	Change
/x86_64-alpine-linux-musl/lib/libdatadog_profiling.a	72.93 MB	72.93 MB	-0% (-1.36 KB) 👌
/x86_64-alpine-linux-musl/lib/libdatadog_profiling.so	8.42 MB	8.42 MB	0% (0 B) 👌

x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu

Artifact	Baseline	Commit	Change
/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libdatadog_profiling.a	90.70 MB	90.70 MB	-0% (-64 B) 👌
/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libdatadog_profiling.so	10.06 MB	10.06 MB	+.02% (+2.72 KB) 🔍

VianneyRuhlmann

Good catch

Aaalibaba42 · 2026-05-13T17:46:01Z

/merge

gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351 · 2026-05-13T17:46:04Z

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.

2026-05-13 17:46:04 UTC ℹ️ Start processing command /merge

2026-05-13 17:46:09 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: pull request added to the queue

The expected merge time in main is approximately 47m (p90).

2026-05-13 18:39:02 UTC ❌ MergeQueue: The checks failed on this merge request

Tests failed on this commit 520bd4d:

allchecks

What to do next?

Investigate the failures and when ready, re-add your pull request to the queue!
If your PR checks are green, try to rebase/merge. It might be because the CI run is a bit old.
Any question, go check the FAQ.

fix(trace_exporter: shared_runtime): unwrap_or being eager is not good

5dfca6c

Aaalibaba42 requested a review from a team as a code owner May 13, 2026 16:59

github-actions Bot added the data-pipeline label May 13, 2026

VianneyRuhlmann approved these changes May 13, 2026

View reviewed changes

gh-worker-dd-devflow-36fce6 Bot added mergequeue-status: queued mergequeue-status: in_progress mergequeue-status: rejected and removed mergequeue-status: queued mergequeue-status: in_progress labels May 13, 2026

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

fix(trace_exporter: shared_runtime): unwrap_or being eager is not good#1983

fix(trace_exporter: shared_runtime): unwrap_or being eager is not good#1983
Aaalibaba42 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
jwiriath/shared_runtime-lazy

Aaalibaba42 commented May 13, 2026

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented May 13, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented May 13, 2026

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented May 13, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

datadog-official Bot commented May 13, 2026

Uh oh!

codecov-commenter commented May 13, 2026

Uh oh!

dd-octo-sts Bot commented May 13, 2026

Uh oh!

VianneyRuhlmann left a comment

Uh oh!

Aaalibaba42 commented May 13, 2026

Uh oh!

gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351 Bot commented May 13, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

3 participants

Conversation

Aaalibaba42 commented May 13, 2026

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented May 13, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

📚 Documentation Check Results

📦 libdd-data-pipeline - 1032 warning(s)

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented May 13, 2026

Clippy Allow Annotation Report

Summary by Rule

Annotation Counts by File

Annotation Stats by Crate

About This Report

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented May 13, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

🔒 Cargo Deny Results

📦 libdd-data-pipeline - 5 error(s)

Uh oh!

datadog-official Bot commented May 13, 2026

Uh oh!

codecov-commenter commented May 13, 2026

Codecov Report

Uh oh!

dd-octo-sts Bot commented May 13, 2026

Artifact Size Benchmark Report

Uh oh!

VianneyRuhlmann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Aaalibaba42 commented May 13, 2026

Uh oh!

gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351 Bot commented May 13, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

What to do next?

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

3 participants

github-actions Bot commented May 13, 2026 •

edited

Loading

📦 `libdd-data-pipeline` - 1032 warning(s)

github-actions Bot commented May 13, 2026 •

edited

Loading

📦 `libdd-data-pipeline` - 5 error(s)

gh-worker-devflow-routing-ef8351 Bot commented May 13, 2026 •

edited

Loading