Skip to content

🧪 Add comprehensive tests for headers analysis in audit#62

Closed
saurabhsharma2u wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
testing-improvement-headers-audit-4951947091279589158
Closed

🧪 Add comprehensive tests for headers analysis in audit#62
saurabhsharma2u wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
testing-improvement-headers-audit-4951947091279589158

Conversation

@saurabhsharma2u

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR addresses the missing tests for the headers analysis logic in the audit plugin. It introduces a comprehensive set of unit tests in plugins/core/tests/audit/headers.test.ts that cover normalization, specific validation rules for each security header, and the weight-based scoring mechanism. The logic was verified using a standalone script as the project's test runner was unavailable in the sandbox environment.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 4951947091279589158 started by @saurabhsharma2u

Improved test coverage for `analyzeHeaders` function in `@crawlith/core`.
Added tests for:
- Header key case-insensitivity
- Array-valued headers normalization
- HSTS validation (missing max-age, missing includeSubDomains)
- CSP validation (empty string)
- X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options validation
- Presence of Referrer-Policy and Permissions-Policy
- Weight-based scoring logic calculation for partial header sets.
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@saurabhsharma2u
saurabhsharma2u marked this pull request as ready for review March 1, 2026 09:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant