Temporary PR creation diagnostic#138
Conversation
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 5e31420f9c
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| "result_contract": "Exit 0 with an ok line when selected deterministic checks pass; nonzero with line-specific errors when they fail." | ||
| "runtime_validation_command": "python skills/ceratops-skill-lifecycle/scripts/runtime/skills-consistency-runtime-validator.py --skill <skill-name>", | ||
| "runtime_inventory_command": "python skills/ceratops-skill-lifecycle/scripts/runtime/skills-consistency-runtime-validator.py --inventory", | ||
| "result_contract": "Validation exits zero with compact JSON when selected deterministic checks pass and nonzero with line-specific errors when they fail; inventory exits zero with compact valid entries and malformed direct-manifest blockers." |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
In this execution block, skill_validation_command, full_validation_command, and section_validation_command still invoke skills-consistency-source-validator.py, whose success paths print plain ok: ... lines rather than compact JSON. Describing all validation successes as JSON will mislead agents or automation that follow this contract for the source-validator commands; split the source-validator and runtime-validator result formats so the helper contract matches the actual outputs.
AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L81-L83
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
1 participant
No description provided.