Skip to content

added keys and links to cell_wave_vector and cell_wave_vectors#60

Open
rowlesmr wants to merge 7 commits into
COMCIFS:mainfrom
rowlesmr:id-for-cell_wave_vector(s)
Open

added keys and links to cell_wave_vector and cell_wave_vectors#60
rowlesmr wants to merge 7 commits into
COMCIFS:mainfrom
rowlesmr:id-for-cell_wave_vector(s)

Conversation

@rowlesmr

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

From discussion in #54

cell_wave_vector (Loop) gains:

  • Set key to _structure.id: so we know the structure to which the vectors belong
  • linked, non-key dataname to _cell_wave_vectors.id: so we know the conditions under which the vectors were measured. I took inspiration from pd_peak and pd_peak_overall.

cell_wave_vectors (Set) gains:

  • _cell_wave_vectors.id to uniquely identify the conditions

@rowlesmr

rowlesmr commented Jul 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I have no idea how this PR is 1000 lines... Will have to go and check

@jamesrhester

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I have no idea how this PR is 1000 lines... Will have to go and check

It seems to fold in a number of your other PRs as well. Not sure what's going on on your side, but I usually create a fresh branch from the current main for each PR. To save work you can cherry-pick the particular commit that corresponds to what you thought this PR was supposed to do.

@rowlesmr

rowlesmr commented Jul 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Must have done a merge the wrong way somehow.

@rowlesmr

rowlesmr commented Jul 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@jamesrhester @gmadaria please excuse the mangled commit history, but it's back on track

rowlesmr added 3 commits July 10, 2026 19:30
no idea how that happened.... Now should just be cel_vector(s) related
I should have just started again.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants