Skip to content

PR9: Bullnym protocol foundation#39

Open
BullishNode wants to merge 9 commits into
pr08-nostr-corefrom
pr09-bullnym-protocol-foundation
Open

PR9: Bullnym protocol foundation#39
BullishNode wants to merge 9 commits into
pr08-nostr-corefrom
pr09-bullnym-protocol-foundation

Conversation

@BullishNode

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Canonical numbered stack rebuild.\n\nBase: pr08-nostr-core\nHead: pr09-bullnym-protocol-foundation\n\nThis replaces the earlier mixed-head review PRs, which used unnumbered head branches against numbered base branches. The branch chain is now canonical and numbered end to end.

Repeated Error-vs-Exception rename churn across the stack's new features stems
from the doc only naming `<Feature>Error`. Record that `<Feature>Exception` is
the same conformant surface (one sealed family per feature, every variant with
toTranslated, foreign errors mapped at the boundary) - the suffix is a naming
choice, not a design difference, and neither warrants a rename. The thing to
fold in is a standalone one-off exception outside its family (R2-AD9c).
bullnym_error.dart routed all eight error kinds through borrowed mempoolError*
keys (the third recurrence of cross-feature l10n key reuse). Add dedicated
bullnym* keys to the en template with bullnym-correct copy and repoint
toTranslated at them, so bullnym error text no longer inherits mempool
semantics and its localization can evolve independently. Other locales fall
back to en until translated upstream (R2-AD9a).
The `models` vocabulary is reserved for data-layer wire types; these are domain
result types (BullnymRegisterResult, BullnymLookupResult). Rename the file to a
domain-appropriate name and update its importers. No behavior change (R2-AD9b).
@BullishNode BullishNode force-pushed the pr09-bullnym-protocol-foundation branch from 6ef2ddb to 92399aa Compare July 8, 2026 07:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants