Skip to content

fix: flake.lock bump + romeo-2 nixarr Jellyfin 10.11.11 hash + redo-2 mcp command type#78

Draft
BCNelson with Copilot wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
copilot/copilotflake-lock-bump-28091081477
Draft

fix: flake.lock bump + romeo-2 nixarr Jellyfin 10.11.11 hash + redo-2 mcp command type#78
BCNelson with Copilot wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
copilot/copilotflake-lock-bump-28091081477

Conversation

Copilot AI commented Jun 24, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Scheduled flake.lock bump pulled nixpkgs with Jellyfin 10.11.11, breaking two hosts.

Changes

nixos/romeo/nixarr.nix — extend nixarr python-deps.nix patch with Jellyfin 10.11.11 OpenAPI hash

  • The existing patch already backfilled 10.11.9 and 10.11.10; 10.11.11 was missing
  • Hash sourced from nixarr upstream commit 67952a6e which added it
"10.11.11" = "sha256-4p/DaeyuVGdsrrUMu8AGtcTulZkGwA8eAvb4PbnCJ/s=";

home-manager/bcnelson/_mixins/mcp/aws/support.nix — fix command type mismatch

  • programs.mcp.servers.*.command expects null or string; was assigned a derivation from pkgs.writeShellScript
# before
command = awsSupportLauncher;
# after
command = "${awsSupportLauncher}";

flake.lock — bumped from copilot/flake-lock-bump-28091081477

- Bump flake.lock from copilot/flake-lock-bump-28091081477 branch
- Add Jellyfin 10.11.11 OpenAPI hash to nixarr patch in nixos/romeo/nixarr.nix
  (sha256-4p/DaeyuVGdsrrUMu8AGtcTulZkGwA8eAvb4PbnCJ/s=)
- Fix programs.mcp.servers.aws-support-mcp-server.command to use string
  path \"${awsSupportLauncher}\" instead of derivation value

Fixes:
- romeo-2: nixarr jellyfin-py build fails - missing 10.11.11 hash
- redo-2: mcp server command must be null or string, not derivation
Copilot AI changed the title [WIP] Fix failed flake.lock bump fix: flake.lock bump + romeo-2 nixarr Jellyfin 10.11.11 hash + redo-2 mcp command type Jun 24, 2026
Copilot AI requested a review from BCNelson June 24, 2026 10:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants