-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
feat: add debounce filters to water level sensors #36
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🧩 Analysis chain
🌐 Web query:
In ESPHome, dobinary_sensorfilters (delayed_on/delayed_off) affect bothbinary_sensor.is_on/is_offconditions used in scripts and trigger callbacks likeon_release? Please cite the official docs.💡 Result:
Yes, in ESPHome, binary_sensor filters like delayed_on and delayed_off affect both the binary_sensor.is_on/is_off conditions used in scripts and automations, as well as trigger callbacks like on_release. Filters are applied in a pipeline to the raw input values before they update the binary sensor's state. The filtered state is what is exposed via .state (used by is_on/is_off conditions), published to Home Assistant, and used by on_state/on_press/on_release triggers. Official docs confirm: "With binary sensor filters you can customize how ESPHome handles your binary sensor values even more... All filters are processed in a pipeline." (esphome.io/components/binary_sensor). The API shows publish_state processes through filters before triggering state change callbacks used by automations. Examples use delayed_off with on_press/on_release for debouncing, confirming triggers fire on filtered state changes.
Citations:
Potential safety delay from filtering a shared control sensor.
Applying
delayed_on/offtofluid_input_sensordelays safety/state checks that usebinary_sensor.is_on/offfor pump stop/start logic. ESPHome filters apply in a pipeline to all state conditions and triggers, so the ~5s delay will extend pump runtime after real dry/full transitions. Validate this worst-case behavior on hardware before merge, or split into a raw safety sensor plus a debounced automation sensor.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents