⚔️ Defining the Blades #1
Replies: 2 comments
|
If Ronin is intended to be a daily-use infrastructure and not just a chat container, these are the critical components I'm missing:
Persistent project context (tech stack, patterns). Ignored paths (distinct from .gitignore). Agent parameters. This ensures immediate alignment when opening a repo, making the agent deterministic and project-aware from prompt zero. |
|
Hey @Foxomax, thanks for laying these out. I have some updates regarding these points:
Instead, I’m proposing a more robust architecture based on "Stances". I just published the details in Discussion #5 and would love to get your thoughts on that approach: 👉 ⚔️ The Stances: Deterministic Context & The End of Model Selection |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
⚔️ Defining the Blades: What are your "Must Have" Features for Ronin?
We are building Ronin with a single, non-negotiable purpose: to provide a masterless coding agent that serves only your code.
We’ve established the Ronin Covenant because we are tired of volatile proprietary tools that shift their terms, cap productivity, and act as black boxes. We are building deterministic infrastructure, not another shifting service.
The Rules of Engagement
As we roadmap the next phase of development, we are committed to respecting our core values to the death:
The Question
We are serious about making Ronin your daily driver. To do that, we need to know what is missing from your arsenal.
What are the "Must Have" features that would make Ronin your default coding companion?
We aren't looking for "nice-to-haves." We want to know the critical blockers—the features so essential that you cannot work without them.
Is it specific context-awareness capabilities?
Deeper integration with local LLMs (Ollama, kimi k2, Minimax)?
Specific diff views or commit generation workflows?
Tell us below. If it respects the Covenant, we will build it.
Build freely.
All reactions