You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
people arrive with years of notes already written — obsidian vaults, joplin
archives, apple notes and google keep exports, plain markdown folders — and
vouch has nothing to say to them. a fresh KB starts empty and stays empty until
someone does enough work in it.
ditto imports all of the above plus chatgpt / claude / gemini / perplexity
exports (heyditto.ai/docs/importing-your-memory), deduping on stable source ids
so re-importing the same export is safe, up to 200 MiB.
vouch has chatgpt_import.py, codex_rollout.py, vouch ingest and the inbox
folder drop. the gap is note vaults — and note vaults are where vouch has an
advantage ditto structurally cannot match: every note is a file with byte
offsets, so imported knowledge can be receipt-backed and citable rather than
paraphrased into an embedding.
What you've tried
vouch ingest <file> → works per-file; no vault semantics (frontmatter,
wikilinks, folder structure), no idempotent re-run.
inbox folder drop → registers and proposes per file, but dropping a
10,000-note vault into it is not a migration story.
vouch import-chatgpt → the shape to copy, one source only.
one source per note; note title and path preserved; frontmatter carried into
source metadata; wikilinks become relation proposals where the target
resolves.
stable source ids derived from the origin's own identifier, so re-running
an import updates rather than duplicates — the property that makes this safe
to run repeatedly, and the one ditto calls out explicitly.
everything lands PENDING. an import is a proposal firehose, not a write.
Compatibility considerations
additive; new CLI subcommands, no kb.* method, no schema change beyond a
stable-id field on sources (nullable, back-compatible).
scale is the real question: a big vault needs a batched, resumable import and a
sane review story on the other side — a triage view over "everything from this
import" is probably a precondition for it being usable, not a nice-to-have.
sibling of #431 (conversation-export importers) — same vouch import <kind>
surface, different sources. worth landing the surface once.
Alternatives
document "convert your vault to markdown and use the inbox" — technically
true, and nobody will.
an obsidian plugin that writes into vouch — pushes the gate to the wrong side
of the boundary.
part of the ditto-style track — see .superpowers/DITTO-STYLE-PLAN.md (T4.1).
What you're trying to do
people arrive with years of notes already written — obsidian vaults, joplin
archives, apple notes and google keep exports, plain markdown folders — and
vouch has nothing to say to them. a fresh KB starts empty and stays empty until
someone does enough work in it.
ditto imports all of the above plus chatgpt / claude / gemini / perplexity
exports (heyditto.ai/docs/importing-your-memory), deduping on stable source ids
so re-importing the same export is safe, up to 200 MiB.
vouch has
chatgpt_import.py,codex_rollout.py,vouch ingestand the inboxfolder drop. the gap is note vaults — and note vaults are where vouch has an
advantage ditto structurally cannot match: every note is a file with byte
offsets, so imported knowledge can be receipt-backed and citable rather than
paraphrased into an embedding.
What you've tried
vouch ingest <file>→ works per-file; no vault semantics (frontmatter,wikilinks, folder structure), no idempotent re-run.
10,000-note vault into it is not a migration story.
vouch import-chatgpt→ the shape to copy, one source only.Suggested shape
source metadata; wikilinks become relation proposals where the target
resolves.
an import updates rather than duplicates — the property that makes this safe
to run repeatedly, and the one ditto calls out explicitly.
does not produce ten thousand pending claims;
--max-claimsapplies.Compatibility considerations
additive; new CLI subcommands, no
kb.*method, no schema change beyond astable-id field on sources (nullable, back-compatible).
scale is the real question: a big vault needs a batched, resumable import and a
sane review story on the other side — a triage view over "everything from this
import" is probably a precondition for it being usable, not a nice-to-have.
sibling of #431 (conversation-export importers) — same
vouch import <kind>surface, different sources. worth landing the surface once.
Alternatives
true, and nobody will.
of the boundary.
part of the ditto-style track — see
.superpowers/DITTO-STYLE-PLAN.md(T4.1).