Suggestion
For highly viral posts and high-profile public figures on contentious topics, add an optional structured author-context layer:
• Relevant domain expertise vs. track record on this specific issue
• Consistent framing patterns, including ideological lean where the public post history shows a clear signal (with sourced examples)
• Multi-axis probabilistic signals + confidence bands
• Automatic weak-signal, low-data, sarcasm, or outdated-view flags
Scope
Limited strictly to high-visibility cases only. Fully transparent, bridging-rated, and with easy user feedback.
Why it helps
It would let readers better evaluate “who is saying this and what priors are they bringing?” — especially for voices who appear neutral. This could reduce deception and support de-escalation across all sides.
Examples (see attached thread for visuals):
- Domain expertise mismatch
- Ideological lean signals
- Multi-axis scores
- Weak-signal flags
Link to X post with full details:
https://x.com/TomGlassAI/status/2054051858369728831
Happy to provide more details or iterate.
Suggestion
For highly viral posts and high-profile public figures on contentious topics, add an optional structured author-context layer:
• Relevant domain expertise vs. track record on this specific issue
• Consistent framing patterns, including ideological lean where the public post history shows a clear signal (with sourced examples)
• Multi-axis probabilistic signals + confidence bands
• Automatic weak-signal, low-data, sarcasm, or outdated-view flags
Scope
Limited strictly to high-visibility cases only. Fully transparent, bridging-rated, and with easy user feedback.
Why it helps
It would let readers better evaluate “who is saying this and what priors are they bringing?” — especially for voices who appear neutral. This could reduce deception and support de-escalation across all sides.
Examples (see attached thread for visuals):
Link to X post with full details:
https://x.com/TomGlassAI/status/2054051858369728831
Happy to provide more details or iterate.