Skip to content

Helm Chart to ease deployment #3

Description

@mpiekunk

Seems like it would increase adoption if the deployment experience was as easy as possible. A helm chart (or two) seems like the easiest way to go. A few thoughts on things we need to discuss or think about:

  1. How to package and manage the lifecycle of the CRD. See https://helm.sh/docs/topics/chart_best_practices/custom_resource_definitions/
  2. We talked about naming the chart "lemurnomic" since the "lemur" name was taken. Does "lemurturbo" make more sense to keep things consistent with kubeturbo?
  3. Will need to document values and defaults. This could go a long way in helping get this project "operationally ready" so it can be widely deployed in a large enterprise environment that may already have Istio or want to customize the deployment.
  4. Should the helm deployment use the operator to deploy like it does today or should we offer two separate deployment options like kubeturbo?

I'll probably think of more as I dig into it.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions