Better support for django

[sassanh]

Thanks for creating this useful extension.

There are some issues using it for django templates, suppose that I'm in the middle of a line containing this:

<div class="{% if some_conditions %}{{ some_class }}else

now I expect pressing <C-X>_ to make it:

<div class="{% if some_conditions %}{{ some_class }}{% else %}

but unfortunately currently it makes it:

{% <div class="{% if some_conditions %}{{ some_class }}else %}

it applies to other similar shortcuts like +, is it possible to fix it?
(this pattern of coding in django templates is pretty common and there are lots of code with this pattern in django admin templates for example)

[tpope]

It's working as designed. I'm guessing changing it to add this special case would be pretty hard, and I'm not even sure it would be universally applicable?

[sassanh]

I see, but for example is a bit better as it's using iW motion instead of I (referring to line 71 of ragtag.vim for and line 143 on same file for + as an example of using I) maybe using iw motion solves the whole issue as iW would make my above example generate this:

<div class="{% if some_conditions %}{{ some_class {%}}else %}

which is a little bit better and iw makes it:

<div class="{% if some_conditions %}{{ some_class }}{% else %}

which is the desired code.

Actually it's not only for django tags, suppose this case: you're typing

<div>some text</div>div

now if you press you expect to get

<div>some text</div><div>{cursor here}</div>

but you get

<p <class="text-error">div></class="text-error">div>

changing iW to iw and changing I to bi in ragtag.vim solved this for me
I don't get it when iW and I motions would be better choices for iw.