diff --git a/delete-and-earn.java b/delete-and-earn.java
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..db47b771
--- /dev/null
+++ b/delete-and-earn.java
@@ -0,0 +1,110 @@
+// Solution - 1
+
+// TimeComplexity: O(n + maxValue)
+// SpaceComplexity: O(maxValue)
+// Explanation: First, I convert the problem into a House Robber pattern. 
+// I build an array arr where arr[i] stores the total points earned by taking number i (i.e., sum of all occurrences of i). 
+// Since picking i deletes i-1 and i+1, it becomes identical to the house robber problem.
+
+class Solution {
+    public int deleteAndEarn(int[] nums) {
+        
+        int max = Integer.MIN_VALUE;
+        for(int num: nums) {
+            if (num>max) max=num;
+        }
+        int[] arr = new int[max+1]; 
+        for(int num:nums) {
+            arr[num]+=num;
+        }
+        int[] dp = new int[arr.length+1];
+        dp[1] = arr[0];
+
+        for(int i=2; i<arr.length+1; i++) {
+            dp[i]= Math.max(dp[i-1], arr[i-1]+dp[i-2]);    
+        }
+
+        return dp[arr.length];      
+    }
+}
+
+
+// Solution - 2
+
+// TimeComplexity: O(maxValue)
+// SpaceComplexity: O(maxValue)
+// Explanation: After building the arr array, I use recursion. At each index, I decide: Take current value → arr[idx] + helper(idx+2); Skip it → helper(idx+1)
+// I store results in dp[idx] to avoid recomputation. Each index is computed once.
+
+class Solution {
+    public int deleteAndEarn(int[] nums) {
+        
+        int max = Integer.MIN_VALUE;
+        for(int num: nums) {
+            if (num>max) max=num;
+        }
+        int[] arr = new int[max+1]; 
+        Integer[] dp = new Integer[max+1];
+        for(int num:nums) {
+            arr[num]+=num;
+        }
+
+        return helper(arr, 0, dp);
+        
+    }
+
+    private int helper(int[] arr, int idx, Integer[] dp) {
+        if(idx>=arr.length) return 0;
+        if(dp[idx] !=null) {
+            return dp[idx];
+        }
+
+        // No choose
+        int case1= arr[idx]+ helper(arr, idx+2, dp);
+
+        // no choose
+        int case2= helper(arr, idx+1, dp);
+        int max = Math.max(case1, case2);
+        dp[idx] =max;
+
+        return max;
+
+    }
+}
+
+// Solution - 3
+
+// TimeComplexity: Exponential
+// SpaceComplexity: O(maxValue)
+// Explanation: Here I recursively try both choices (take or skip) without memoization. 
+// This causes repeated evaluation of the same states, leading to exponential time complexity.
+
+
+class Solution {
+    public int deleteAndEarn(int[] nums) {
+        int max = Integer.MIN_VALUE;
+        for(int num: nums) {
+            if (num>max) max=num;
+        }
+        int[] arr = new int[max+1]; 
+        for(int num:nums) {
+            arr[num]+=num;
+        }
+
+        return helper(arr, 0);
+        
+    }
+
+    private int helper(int[] arr, int idx) {
+        if(idx>=arr.length) return 0;
+
+        // No choose
+        int case1= arr[idx]+ helper(arr, idx+2);
+
+        // no choose
+        int case2= helper(arr, idx+1);
+
+        return Math.max(case1, case2);
+
+    }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/minimum-falling-path-sum.java b/minimum-falling-path-sum.java
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..53cc1c0a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/minimum-falling-path-sum.java
@@ -0,0 +1,135 @@
+
+// Solution - 1
+
+// TimeComplexity: O(n²)
+// SpaceComplexity: O(n)
+// Explanation: I solve it from the bottom row upward. I keep a prev array that stores the minimum path sums from the row below. 
+// For each cell, I add its value to the minimum of the three possible downward moves (down, down-left, down-right). After processing a row, I move upward. 
+// Finally, I return the minimum value in the top row.
+class Solution {
+    public int minFallingPathSum(int[][] matrix) {
+        int n = matrix.length;
+        int[] prev = matrix[n-1].clone();
+        
+        for(int i=n-2; i>=0; i--){
+            int[] curr = new int[n];
+            for (int j = 0; j < n; j++) {
+                int down = prev[j];
+                int left = (j > 0) ? prev[j - 1] : Integer.MAX_VALUE;
+                int right = (j < n - 1) ? prev[j + 1] : Integer.MAX_VALUE;
+                
+                curr[j] = matrix[i][j] + Math.min(down, Math.min(left, right));
+            }
+            
+            prev = curr; // move upward  
+        }
+        int min = Integer.MAX_VALUE;
+
+        for (int val : prev) {
+            min = Math.min(min, val);
+        }
+        return min;
+        
+    }
+}
+
+
+// Solution - 2
+
+// TimeComplexity: O(n²)
+// SpaceComplexity: O(1)
+// Explanation: Here I modify the matrix directly. Starting from the second-last row, 
+// I update each cell by adding the minimum of the three possible cells from the row below. 
+// At the end, the first row contains the minimum falling path sums, and I return the minimum among them.
+
+class Solution {
+    public int minFallingPathSum(int[][] matrix) {
+        int m = matrix.length;
+        for(int i=m-2; i>=0; i--){
+            for(int j=0; j<m; j++) {
+                int down = matrix[i+1][j];
+
+                int left = (j > 0) 
+                        ? matrix[i+1][j-1] 
+                        : Integer.MAX_VALUE;
+
+                int right = (j < m-1) 
+                            ? matrix[i+1][j+1] 
+                            : Integer.MAX_VALUE;
+
+                matrix[i][j] += Math.min(down, Math.min(left, right));
+            }   
+        }
+        int min = Integer.MAX_VALUE;
+
+        for(int i=0; i<m; i++) {
+            min = Math.min(min, matrix[0][i]);
+
+        }
+        return min;
+        
+    }
+}
+
+// Solution - 3
+
+// TimeComplexity: O(n²)
+// SpaceComplexity: O(n²)
+// Explanation: I use recursion starting from each column in the first row. From each cell, I recursively explore the three possible downward directions. 
+// I store results in dp[r][c] to avoid recomputation, so each cell is solved once.
+
+class Solution {
+    public int minFallingPathSum(int[][] matrix) {
+        int m = matrix.length;
+        Integer[][] dp = new Integer[m][m];
+        int min = Integer.MAX_VALUE;
+        for(int i=0; i<m; i++){
+            min = Math.min(min, helper(matrix, 0, i, m, dp));
+        }
+        return min;
+        
+    }
+
+    private int helper(int[][] mat, int r, int c, int m, Integer[][] dp) {
+        if(r<0 || c<0 || r>=m || c>=m) return Integer.MAX_VALUE - 10000;
+        if(r==m-1) return mat[r][c];
+        if(dp[r][c] !=null) return dp[r][c];
+
+        int case1= mat[r][c] + helper(mat, r+1, c-1, m, dp);
+        int case2= mat[r][c] + helper(mat, r+1, c, m, dp);
+        int case3= mat[r][c] + helper(mat, r+1, c+1, m, dp);
+        int min = Math.min(case1, Math.min(case2,case3));
+        dp[r][c] = min;
+        return min;
+    }
+}
+
+
+// Solution - 4
+
+// TimeComplexity: O(3^n)
+// SpaceComplexity: O(n)
+// Explanation: Here I recursively explore all possible downward paths without memoization. 
+// This leads to repeated recomputation of the same subproblems and exponential time complexity.
+
+class Solution {
+    public int minFallingPathSum(int[][] matrix) {
+        int m = matrix.length;
+        int min = Integer.MAX_VALUE;
+        for(int i=0; i<m; i++){
+            min = Math.min(min, helper(matrix, 0, i, m));
+        }
+        return min;
+        
+    }
+
+    private int helper(int[][] mat, int r, int c, int m) {
+        if(r<0 || c<0 || r>=m || c>=m) return 101;
+        if(r==m-1) return mat[r][c];
+
+        int case1= mat[r][c] + helper(mat, r+1, c-1, m);
+        int case2= mat[r][c] + helper(mat, r+1, c, m);
+        int case3= mat[r][c] + helper(mat, r+1, c+1, m);
+        return Math.min(case1, Math.min(case2,case3));
+    }
+}