What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. run face detector
2. change size of face bounding box
3. rerun asm
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
I expect to get the same result. But the ASM results are very different and can
be way out of place. (I found that sometimes for original face detector results
the ASM is very accurate or unacurate but changing the box will change the asm
result - sometimes good, sometimes bad)
The ASM is very sensitive to the size of the face binding box.
Why is that and how can we solve that?
Is there an optimal size for images or for the faces in the images?
What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
the latest one
Please provide any additional information below.
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
av...@pixtr.meon 22 Oct 2012 at 2:27Attachments: