Solid People to RDF : What to display or store?

[jeff-zucker]

Please use this issue to discuss which of the fields for Solid Team members shown in the card below should be a) stored for our querying and/or b) displayed to users on sp.org either required or optional and also to discuss appearance formatting here. See also Solid People to RDF : Which ontologies?.

[jeff-zucker]

@justinwb commented that "board" is not an appropriate term. The term "facilitator" might work. For example DEI-Faciilitators facilitate the DEI-Team Editor-Facilitators facilitate the panels.

[kay-kim]

Hey Jeff -- this looks amazing. Just wondering:

• Instead of Teams, maybe "Solid Teams"?
• Also, maybe add to the teams in case people people are interested.
• I'm a little ambivalent about the "Works At" field. On one hand, it's a common bio detail. On the other hand, it almost seems to pull focus away from Solid. Maybe either remove or lower in prominence by incorporating as part of the bio (like your example shows).