diff --git a/ra/ra.go b/ra/ra.go
index 8e92a095faa..824ff6b1129 100644
--- a/ra/ra.go
+++ b/ra/ra.go
@@ -2239,10 +2239,12 @@ func (ra *RegistrationAuthorityImpl) NewOrder(ctx context.Context, req *rapb.New
 		}
 
 		// If the identifier is a wildcard DNS name, it must have exactly one
-		// DNS-01 type challenge. The PA guarantees this at order creation time,
-		// but we verify again to be safe.
+		// DNS-01 or DNS-Account-01 type challenge. The PA guarantees this at
+		// order creation time, but we verify again to be safe.
 		if ident.Type == identifier.TypeDNS && strings.HasPrefix(ident.Value, "*.") &&
-			(len(authz.Challenges) != 1 || authz.Challenges[0].Type != core.ChallengeTypeDNS01) {
+			(len(authz.Challenges) != 1 ||
+				(authz.Challenges[0].Type != core.ChallengeTypeDNS01 &&
+					authz.Challenges[0].Type != core.ChallengeTypeDNSAccount01)) {
 			return nil, berrors.InternalServerError(
 				"SA.GetAuthorizations returned a DNS wildcard authz (%s) with invalid challenge(s)",
 				authz.ID)
diff --git a/ra/ra_test.go b/ra/ra_test.go
index 997aa4f31cb..ace57670085 100644
--- a/ra/ra_test.go
+++ b/ra/ra_test.go
@@ -2120,6 +2120,46 @@ func TestNewOrderAuthzReuseSafety(t *testing.T) {
 	test.AssertContains(t, err.Error(), "SA.GetAuthorizations returned a DNS wildcard authz (1) with invalid challenge(s)")
 }
 
+// TestNewOrderAuthzReuseDNSAccount01 checks that the RA correctly allows reuse
+// of a wildcard authorization with a DNS-Account-01 challenge.
+func TestNewOrderAuthzReuseDNSAccount01(t *testing.T) {
+	_, _, ra, _, _, registration, cleanUp := initAuthorities(t)
+	defer cleanUp()
+
+	ctx := context.Background()
+	idents := identifier.ACMEIdentifiers{identifier.NewDNS("*.zombo.com")}
+
+	// Use a mock SA that returns a valid DNS-Account-01 authz for wildcard
+	expires := time.Now().Add(24 * time.Hour)
+	ra.SA = &mockSAWithAuthzs{
+		authzs: []*core.Authorization{
+			{
+				ID:             "1",
+				Identifier:     identifier.NewDNS("*.zombo.com"),
+				RegistrationID: registration.Id,
+				Status:         "valid",
+				Expires:        &expires,
+				Challenges: []core.Challenge{
+					{
+						Type:   core.ChallengeTypeDNSAccount01,
+						Status: core.StatusValid,
+						Token:  core.NewToken(),
+					},
+				},
+			},
+		},
+	}
+
+	orderReq := &rapb.NewOrderRequest{
+		RegistrationID: registration.Id,
+		Identifiers:    idents.ToProtoSlice(),
+	}
+
+	// Create an order - it should succeed with DNS-Account-01 wildcard reuse
+	_, err := ra.NewOrder(ctx, orderReq)
+	test.AssertNotError(t, err, "NewOrder failed to reuse wildcard authz with DNS-Account-01")
+}
+
 func TestNewOrderWildcard(t *testing.T) {
 	_, _, ra, _, _, registration, cleanUp := initAuthorities(t)
 	defer cleanUp()
diff --git a/test/integration/dns_account_01_test.go b/test/integration/dns_account_01_test.go
index 5f2d72661b1..e5bb3d2c129 100644
--- a/test/integration/dns_account_01_test.go
+++ b/test/integration/dns_account_01_test.go
@@ -361,3 +361,93 @@ func TestDNSAccount01WildcardDomain(t *testing.T) {
 		}
 	}
 }
+
+func TestDNSAccount01WildcardAuthorizationReuse(t *testing.T) {
+	t.Parallel()
+
+	if os.Getenv("BOULDER_CONFIG_DIR") == "test/config" {
+		t.Skip("Test requires dns-account-01 to be enabled")
+	}
+
+	// Use same domain for both orders to trigger authorization reuse
+	domain := random_domain()
+	wildcardDomain := fmt.Sprintf("*.%s", domain)
+
+	c, err := makeClient()
+	if err != nil {
+		t.Fatalf("creating client: %s", err)
+	}
+
+	idents := []acme.Identifier{{Type: "dns", Value: wildcardDomain}}
+
+	// First order: Create and complete DNS-Account-01 challenge
+	order1, err := c.Client.NewOrder(c.Account, idents)
+	if err != nil {
+		t.Fatalf("creating first order: %s", err)
+	}
+
+	authzURL := order1.Authorizations[0]
+	auth1, err := c.Client.FetchAuthorization(c.Account, authzURL)
+	if err != nil {
+		t.Fatalf("fetching first authorization: %s", err)
+	}
+
+	chal, ok := auth1.ChallengeMap[acme.ChallengeTypeDNSAccount01]
+	if !ok {
+		t.Fatal("dns-account-01 challenge not offered by server")
+	}
+
+	_, err = testSrvClient.AddDNSAccount01Response(c.Account.URL, domain, chal.KeyAuthorization)
+	if err != nil {
+		t.Fatalf("adding DNS response: %s", err)
+	}
+	t.Cleanup(func() {
+		_, _ = testSrvClient.RemoveDNSAccount01Response(c.Account.URL, domain)
+	})
+
+	chal, err = c.Client.UpdateChallenge(c.Account, chal)
+	if err != nil {
+		t.Fatalf("updating challenge: %s", err)
+	}
+
+	// Wait for authorization to become valid
+	auth1, err = c.Client.FetchAuthorization(c.Account, authzURL)
+	if err != nil {
+		t.Fatalf("fetching first authorization after challenge update: %s", err)
+	}
+
+	if auth1.Status != "valid" {
+		t.Fatalf("expected first authorization status to be 'valid', got '%s'", auth1.Status)
+	}
+
+	// Second order: Should reuse the existing authorization
+	order2, err := c.Client.NewOrder(c.Account, idents)
+	if err != nil {
+		t.Fatalf("creating second order: %s", err)
+	}
+
+	if len(order2.Authorizations) != 1 {
+		t.Fatalf("expected 1 authorization in second order, got %d", len(order2.Authorizations))
+	}
+
+	authzURL2 := order2.Authorizations[0]
+	auth2, err := c.Client.FetchAuthorization(c.Account, authzURL2)
+	if err != nil {
+		t.Fatalf("fetching second authorization: %s", err)
+	}
+
+	// Verify reuse occurred: same authorization URL
+	if authzURL != authzURL2 {
+		t.Fatalf("expected same authorization URL, got different: %s != %s", authzURL, authzURL2)
+	}
+
+	// Verify authorization is already valid (no re-validation needed)
+	if auth2.Status != "valid" {
+		t.Fatalf("expected reused authorization status to be 'valid', got '%s'", auth2.Status)
+	}
+
+	// Verify authorization still has DNS-Account-01 challenge
+	if _, ok := auth2.ChallengeMap[acme.ChallengeTypeDNSAccount01]; !ok {
+		t.Fatal("expected reused authorization to have dns-account-01 challenge")
+	}
+}