Anyone have plans/thoughts about factoring in things like systemd service definition(s) and /etc style config settings/storage #338
Unanswered
nodenineinc
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Hello all.
I want to preemptively thank everyone for their great work on this project. I've only just discovered it and cloned the repo and pulled one of the releases and started studying the project.
Perhaps I've not yet come across mention in either the source files, wiki, etc, but are there any thoughts of factoring in a systemd service definition? While ENV variables obviously aren't the typical /etc/* style configuration definitions, I am not aware myself of any issues this would have preventing at least the process control be handled in a more standardized way. This would allow for other tooling such as saltstack/etc to be able to help auto-manage deployments.
I just wanted to check to see if there was any intentional reasoning behind this before I worked on submitting one.
I am also curious to understand the thinking behind CLI and ENV vars as far as providing arguments/settings so I don't inadvertently work against any intended decisions behind this.
I appreciate any input so I can better understand.
Cheers,
-Chris
All reactions