The discussion of the meeting primarily focused on the issue of the Sun being subtracted while not rephased to the centre of the field, leading to unexpected results.
It was identified that the problem occurred because the MODEL_DATA_SUN was not rephased back to the original Measurement Set (MS) after subtraction.
To address this issue, the solution is to ensure that the MODEL_DATA_SUN is properly rephased to match the original MS.
Additionally, there was a recommendation to name the scans with their actual scan numbers (e.g., 3, 5, 7) instead of index numbers (0, 1, 2) to avoid confusion and improve clarity in the data and avoid the GLOB function problem.
Hopefully, the peeling step with the quartical will yield better results by implementing these suggestions.
The discussion of the meeting primarily focused on the issue of the Sun being subtracted while not rephased to the centre of the field, leading to unexpected results.
It was identified that the problem occurred because the MODEL_DATA_SUN was not rephased back to the original Measurement Set (MS) after subtraction.
To address this issue, the solution is to ensure that the MODEL_DATA_SUN is properly rephased to match the original MS.
Additionally, there was a recommendation to name the scans with their actual scan numbers (e.g., 3, 5, 7) instead of index numbers (0, 1, 2) to avoid confusion and improve clarity in the data and avoid the GLOB function problem.
Hopefully, the peeling step with the quartical will yield better results by implementing these suggestions.