Feature or enhancement
Proposal:
As part of adding free-threading support to LibCST, we noticed there is a lot of lock contention on TYPE_LOCK inside the _PyType_LookupRef function. In the LibCST, the common "visitor" pattern is used. For example, in the _visitors.py module there is the code:
visit_func = getattr(self, f"visit_{type(node).__name__}", None)
The second argument to getattr() is a non-interned string and it causes the cached and lock-free path of _PyType_LookupRef() never to be taken. Instead, the TYPE_LOCK mutex is acquired on each lookup. This obviously scales very badly if there are multiple threads looking up class methods using this pattern.
Testing was done with Python 3.13 but I believe the same issue exists with 3.14.
Has this already been discussed elsewhere?
This is a minor feature, which does not need previous discussion elsewhere
Links to previous discussion of this feature:
No response
Linked PRs
Feature or enhancement
Proposal:
As part of adding free-threading support to LibCST, we noticed there is a lot of lock contention on
TYPE_LOCKinside the_PyType_LookupReffunction. In the LibCST, the common "visitor" pattern is used. For example, in the_visitors.pymodule there is the code:The second argument to
getattr()is a non-interned string and it causes the cached and lock-free path of_PyType_LookupRef()never to be taken. Instead, theTYPE_LOCKmutex is acquired on each lookup. This obviously scales very badly if there are multiple threads looking up class methods using this pattern.Testing was done with Python 3.13 but I believe the same issue exists with 3.14.
Has this already been discussed elsewhere?
This is a minor feature, which does not need previous discussion elsewhere
Links to previous discussion of this feature:
No response
Linked PRs