Support for `+draft/unreact`

[englut]

I notice that I can see reacts, and can react on some clients (some clients require both react & unreact to do any reacting), but I can't unreact at all.

Would it be possible to support +draft/unreact?

[progval]

When receiving an unreact from a client we would need to fetch reactions to the message they are reacting to, find a matching one, and redact it. Should be doable.

[englut]

That would be awesome @progval!
I didn't expect to encounter a scenario where +draft/react is supported but not +draft/unreact given that both are under the same spec. But with the nature of this bridge/bouncer, I can see why unreact is more difficult to implement. I am glad it's possible tho 🙏 Hopefully it doesn't take too much effort 🫡

[progval]

given that both are under the same spec

They are, but the spec was written in 2017 without unreact, which was added this year.

[englut]

Ohhhh that's fair. I hadn't even considered that. I guess that's the nature of draft/ specs!! 🙏