Problem Statement:
The BridgeLearn App currently lacks functionality for live sessions, which could improve the interactive experience for users, especially for learning or teaching sessions.
Proposed Feature:
I am planning to implement a live session feature for the app as part of Social Winter of Code. However, before starting the implementation, I would like to clarify a few points regarding the preferred approach for this feature.
Questions:
-
Preferred Technology:
- Do you have any preference for the technology we should use for live sessions? For example:
- Jitsi Meet: Free and open-source, with a public server that can be used without costs.
- WebRTC: Can be self-hosted for free, but may require more setup and customization.
- Other solutions: Do you have any preferred services or platforms?
-
Session Features:
- What specific features do you want the live session to include? (e.g., video/audio chat, screen sharing, real-time chat, user management, etc.)
- Should there be a limit on the number of participants in a session?
-
Cost Constraints:
- Are there any concerns about external costs (e.g., hosting fees, third-party services) that I should consider when selecting the technology?
Additional Considerations:
- If there are any specific tools, frameworks, or design choices you'd like me to consider while implementing this feature, please let me know.
Looking forward to your suggestions and guidance.
Problem Statement:
The BridgeLearn App currently lacks functionality for live sessions, which could improve the interactive experience for users, especially for learning or teaching sessions.
Proposed Feature:
I am planning to implement a live session feature for the app as part of Social Winter of Code. However, before starting the implementation, I would like to clarify a few points regarding the preferred approach for this feature.
Questions:
Preferred Technology:
Session Features:
Cost Constraints:
Additional Considerations:
Looking forward to your suggestions and guidance.