Hello and thank you for this new tool, which seems promising.
I was wondering, in the case of use with one or more PostgreSQL servers, why the tool necessarily requires a PostgreSQL server that will unnecessarily consume resources on the client machine.
Would it not be possible to make it optional so that it fits the widest possible range of use cases?
Thank you for your attention.
Hello and thank you for this new tool, which seems promising.
I was wondering, in the case of use with one or more PostgreSQL servers, why the tool necessarily requires a PostgreSQL server that will unnecessarily consume resources on the client machine.
Would it not be possible to make it optional so that it fits the widest possible range of use cases?
Thank you for your attention.