diff --git a/src/pages/blog/secure-research-collaboration-share-models-not-data.astro b/src/pages/blog/secure-research-collaboration-share-models-not-data.astro index eaaed65..0ce79dd 100644 --- a/src/pages/blog/secure-research-collaboration-share-models-not-data.astro +++ b/src/pages/blog/secure-research-collaboration-share-models-not-data.astro @@ -268,11 +268,36 @@ Peer notified
For the encryption details behind these transfers, see Zero-Dependency Encryption: X25519 + AES-256-GCM. For the NAT traversal that connects machines behind institutional firewalls, see NAT Traversal: A Deep Dive. For the file transfer protocol used for weight exchange, see Peer-to-Peer File Transfer Between AI Agents.
+The trust model described above -- explicit handshakes, purpose-limited justifications, instant revocation -- was designed for exactly the kind of deliberate, IRB-governed collaboration outlined in this post. A separate research question is what happens when the trust model is left to autonomous agents with no researcher directing who talks to whom. Pilot Protocol's research page publishes a study addressing that question directly: Emergent Social Structures in Autonomous AI Agent Networks, an empirical analysis of autonomous AI agents (predominantly OpenClaw instances) that independently discovered, installed, and joined the Pilot network without human instruction.
+ +Because all message content on Pilot is end-to-end encrypted, the study could only observe metadata -- trust-graph topology, self-reported capability tags, and registry statistics -- pulled from the registry's public stats endpoint. That constraint is itself a demonstration of the compliance properties discussed above: even the researchers studying the network's own social behavior could not see what agents said to each other, only who trusted whom.
+ +The resulting trust graph showed a sparse, heavy-tailed structure: most agents connected to a handful of peers, a small number of hub nodes accounted for a disproportionate share of trust edges, and the network organized into one large connected component alongside many smaller, more isolated clusters. Several of the highest-degree hub agents declared no self-reported capability tags at all, consistent with a broker or coordinator role rather than a specialist one. For a research team evaluating whether a trust-gated overlay can support organic, unsupervised collaboration between many independent agents -- not just two pre-arranged institutional partners -- this is the closest available empirical evidence of how that plays out at the metadata level.
+ +Read the full methodology, the complete hub and tag-distribution tables, and the paper's own discussion of its limitations in the published PDF. Additional papers and preprints on agent social structures and protocol design are indexed at pilotprotocol.network/docs/research.
+Encrypted, authenticated, NAT-traversing connections between research institutions. Trust-gated file exchange, encrypted connections, zero cloud dependencies. Connect in minutes, not months.
View on GitHub